Foundations & Measurement

CHEM 50 — General Chemistry I · Dr. Karmach

build Jul 13 · 15:51 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · OpenStax Chemistry 2e where noted
Dr. Karmach

By the end of this unit, you can…

  • Classify matter as an element, a compound, or a mixture
  • Distinguish precision from accuracy in measured data
  • Report measurements and results with the correct significant figures
  • Convert units with conversion factors, canceling units at each step
  • Use density as a conversion factor between mass and volume
Dr. Karmach

Today's route 🗺️

  1. Classifying Matter
  2. Precision & Accuracy
  3. Significant Figures
  4. Dimensional Analysis
  5. Density as a Conversion Factor
Dr. Karmach

1 · Classifying Matter

Classify any sample as an element, a compound, or a homogeneous or heterogeneous mixture by counting kinds of particles and phases.

Dr. Karmach

Two ways to take matter apart

Boiling seawater leaves salt behind. Water never leaves anything behind; splitting it takes a chemical reaction. Chemistry sorts matter by exactly this difference.

Dr. Karmach

Pure substance or mixture

A pure substance contains one kind of particle, so its composition is fixed. A mixture contains two or more kinds; its composition can vary, and each component keeps its identity.

Dr. Karmach

Element or compound

Both are pure substances. An element contains one kind of atom; no chemical reaction breaks it down. A compound contains two or more elements bonded in a fixed ratio; a chemical reaction can take it apart.

elements: Cu · O₂ · S₈
one kind of atom each — 118 elements known
compounds: H₂O · NaCl · CO₂
two or more elements, in a ratio that never changes
Dr. Karmach

Homogeneous or heterogeneous

A phase is a uniform region separated from its neighbors by a physical boundary. One phase throughout: homogeneous. Two or more phases: heterogeneous.

salt water — one phase
homogeneous: any drop matches any other drop
oil on water — two phases
heterogeneous: the top sample is oil, the bottom sample is water
Dr. Karmach

The complete map

Two counts place any sample: the kinds of particles, then the elements or the phases.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Count the kinds of particles. One → pure substance; more → mixture.
  2. Count the elements or the phases. Pure: elements. Mixture: phases.
  3. Name the class. One element → element. More → compound. One phase → homogeneous. More → heterogeneous.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — carbon dioxide

CO₂ from a fire extinguisher
every particle: 1 C + 2 O = 3 atoms, the same in every molecule

A CO₂ fire extinguisher discharges nothing but carbon dioxide. Classify the gas.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

CO₂ from a fire extinguisher
every particle: 1 C + 2 O = 3 atoms, the same in every molecule

Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles

Every particle in the tank is the same CO₂ molecule. One kind of particle: a pure substance.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

CO₂ from a fire extinguisher
every particle: 1 C + 2 O = 3 atoms, the same in every molecule
Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles Step 2 · Count the elements or the phases

A pure substance, so count elements. The formula holds carbon and oxygen: two elements.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

CO₂ from a fire extinguisher
every particle: 1 C + 2 O = 3 atoms, the same in every molecule
Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles Step 2 · Count the elements or the phases Step 3 · Name the class
CO₂ → a compound
pure substance · two elements · fixed 1 C : 2 O ratio
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

CO₂ from a fire extinguisher
every particle: 1 C + 2 O = 3 atoms, the same in every molecule
Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles Step 2 · Count the elements or the phases Step 3 · Name the class
CO₂ → a compound
pure substance · two elements · fixed 1 C : 2 O ratio
Every CO₂ molecule carries the same 1 : 2 ratio, and only a chemical reaction separates the carbon from the oxygen. Fixed composition marks a compound.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — salt water

salt water
one clear liquid — uniform throughout, every drop the same

Ocean water is salt dissolved in water.

A common first attempt: uniform throughout, so a compound. Test it.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

salt water
one clear liquid — uniform throughout, every drop the same

A common first attempt

salt water = a compound?
a compound keeps one fixed ratio — this sample holds however much salt was stirred in ✗

Stir in more salt: still clear, still salt water. The ratio changed with no chemical reaction. A compound's composition cannot change without one.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

salt water
one clear liquid — uniform throughout, every drop the same
A common first attempt
salt water = a compound?
a compound keeps one fixed ratio — this sample holds however much salt was stirred in ✗
Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles

Water molecules and dissolved salt: two kinds. A mixture, and boiling, a physical change, separates them.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

salt water
one clear liquid — uniform throughout, every drop the same
A common first attempt
salt water = a compound?
a compound keeps one fixed ratio — this sample holds however much salt was stirred in ✗
Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles Step 2 · Count the elements or the phases Step 3 · Name the class

A mixture, so count phases. One phase, uniform throughout:

salt water → a homogeneous mixture
two kinds of particles · one phase · composition varies
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

salt water
one clear liquid — uniform throughout, every drop the same
A common first attempt
salt water = a compound?
a compound keeps one fixed ratio — this sample holds however much salt was stirred in ✗
Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles Step 2 · Count the elements or the phases Step 3 · Name the class
salt water → a homogeneous mixture
two kinds of particles · one phase · composition varies
Uniform answers the phase question, not the purity question. Salt water is uniform and still a mixture.
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: uniform does not mean compound

water — always 2 H : 1 O
compound: one substance, fixed ratio, separated only by chemical reaction
salt water — any ratio that dissolves
homogeneous mixture: uniform, variable composition, separated by boiling

A compound keeps one fixed ratio. A homogeneous mixture is uniform, but its composition can vary. Uniformity describes phases, never bonding.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — oil-and-vinegar dressing

oil-and-vinegar dressing
an oil layer floating on a vinegar layer
step question answer
1 · kinds of particles one kind, or more? more than one →
2 · phases how many phases? distinct layers
3 · name the class

Complete the three counts.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — oil-and-vinegar dressing

oil-and-vinegar dressing
an oil layer floating on a vinegar layer
step question answer
1 · kinds of particles one kind, or more? more than one →
2 · phases how many phases? distinct layers
3 · name the class

Complete the three counts.

dressing → a heterogeneous mixture
two kinds of particles · two phases — a top sample is oil, a bottom sample is vinegar
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

Calling a uniform mixture a compound. Brass is uniform, but its copper-to-zinc ratio varies batch to batch. A compound keeps one fixed ratio. Uniform appearance does not show chemical bonds.
Calling every multi-substance sample heterogeneous. Air holds nitrogen, oxygen, and argon in one phase. Several substances can share a single uniform phase: homogeneous.
Reading "same properties throughout" as pure. Same everywhere means one phase, nothing more. A pure substance also needs fixed composition, and sugar water's composition can vary.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

white vinegar — acetic acid dissolved in water
one clear liquid, uniform throughout

A bottle of white vinegar looks completely uniform. How should it be classified, and why?

  1. Pure substance — it shows the same properties at every point, so it is a single substance
  2. Homogeneous mixture — it is uniform throughout, but its acid-to-water ratio can vary
  3. Compound — a uniform liquid must have its components chemically bonded in a fixed ratio
  4. Heterogeneous mixture — it contains more than one substance, so it cannot be uniform
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: B

white vinegar → a homogeneous mixture — answer B
two kinds of particles · one phase · one bottle can hold more acid than another

A: same properties throughout shows one phase, not one substance — the composition can still vary. C: uniform appearance does not show bonding; the acid and water separate by distillation, a physical change. D: several substances can share one phase; classification follows the phase count, not the substance count.

Uniform → homogeneous. Variable composition → mixture. Both labels apply to the same bottle.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — air, brass, milk

air · brass · milk
a gas, a solid, and a liquid

The air in the room, the brass of a doorknob, a glass of milk. Work the three steps on each sample.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — kinds of particles

air · brass · milk
a gas, a solid, and a liquid

Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles

sample particles
air N₂, O₂, Ar, and more
brass copper atoms and zinc atoms
milk water, fats, proteins, sugars
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — kinds of particles

air · brass · milk
a gas, a solid, and a liquid

Step 1 · Count the kinds of particles

sample particles
air N₂, O₂, Ar, and more
brass copper atoms and zinc atoms
milk water, fats, proteins, sugars

Each sample holds more than one kind of particle: three mixtures, in three physical states.

A mixture can be a gas, a solid, or a liquid. State does not enter the classification.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — phases and the class

air · brass · milk — three mixtures

Step 2 · Count the elements or the phases

sample phases
air one, uniform at every point
brass one, a uniform solid
milk two, fat droplets in a watery liquid
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — phases and the class

air · brass · milk — three mixtures
Step 2 · Count the elements or the phases
sample phases
air one, uniform at every point
brass one, a uniform solid
milk two, fat droplets in a watery liquid

Step 3 · Name the class

air → homogeneous · brass → homogeneous · milk → heterogeneous
air: 78% N₂ + 21% O₂ + 1% other = 100% — one phase, variable composition
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — phases and the class

air · brass · milk — three mixtures
Step 2 · Count the elements or the phases
sample phases
air one, uniform at every point
brass one, a uniform solid
milk two, fat droplets in a watery liquid

Step 3 · Name the class

air → homogeneous · brass → homogeneous · milk → heterogeneous
air: 78% N₂ + 21% O₂ + 1% other = 100% — one phase, variable composition
Milk looks uniform, but magnification shows fat droplets with real boundaries. Classification follows the phase count, not appearance.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

steel — iron with a small amount of carbon
one uniform solid; the carbon content differs from grade to grade

Every point of a steel beam shows the same properties. How should the steel be classified, and why?

  1. Compound — it is uniform throughout, so the iron and carbon must be bonded in a fixed ratio
  2. Pure substance — the same properties at every point mean a single substance
  3. Homogeneous mixture — one uniform phase, and its iron-to-carbon ratio varies from grade to grade
  4. Heterogeneous mixture — a solid built from two substances must contain two phases
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: C

steel → a homogeneous mixture — answer C
two kinds of particles · one phase · carbon content varies by grade

A: no fixed ratio exists — every grade holds a different amount of carbon. B: same properties throughout shows one phase; the composition can still vary. D: two substances can share one phase; the carbon atoms sit dissolved among the iron atoms.

A solid can be a solution. One uniform phase with variable composition is homogeneous, in any physical state.
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A sealed bottle of soda water looks uniform throughout. Work the counts: kinds of particles, then phases. What class results?
  2. Ice floats in liquid water. How many kinds of particles? How many phases? Is the sample a mixture?

Separating a mixture is a physical change: boiling, filtering, settling. Breaking a compound into its elements is a chemical change. The same distinction, physical or chemical, classifies every property a substance shows.

Dr. Karmach

2 · Precision & Accuracy

Judge a set of repeated measurements two ways — precision from how closely the trials agree with one another, accuracy from how close their average is to the true value.

Dr. Karmach

The same wrong answer, four times

A 50.00-g standard is weighed four times. Every reading lands near 51.4 g. The trials agree with one another; not one of them is right.

Dr. Karmach

Two questions about repeated measurements

Repeated trials form a set, and the set is judged twice. Each verdict comes from its own comparison.

precise — the trials agree with one another
uses only the trials themselves
accurate — the average lands on the true value
uses the average and the accepted true value
Dr. Karmach

The four outcomes

The center is the true value; dots are trials; × marks the average. A tight cluster is precise, wherever it sits. An average on the center is accurate, however wide the scatter. The verdicts are independent.

Dr. Karmach

A number for each verdict

Each verdict has its own number. The range measures agreement among the trials. The error measures how far the average sits from the true value.

range = highest trial − lowest trial
small range → the trials agree → precise
error = average − true value
error near zero → accurate · error ÷ true value × 100 = percent error
Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Compute the range: highest trial − lowest.
  2. Judge precision: a small range means the trials agree.
  3. Compute the average of the trials.
  4. Judge accuracy: compare the average with the true value. State both verdicts.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — checking a balance

trials: 51.42 g · 51.38 g · 51.44 g · 51.40 g
true value: 50.00 g (calibration standard) · wanted: both verdicts

A balance is checked with a standard of known mass, weighed four times.

Judge the set: precise? accurate?

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

trials: 51.42 g · 51.38 g · 51.44 g · 51.40 g

Step 1 · Compute the range

range: 51.44 g − 51.38 g = 0.06 g
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

trials: 51.42 g · 51.38 g · 51.44 g · 51.40 g
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 51.44 g − 51.38 g = 0.06 g
Step 2 · Judge precision

A spread of 0.06 g on a 50-g measurement: the trials agree. Precise.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

trials: 51.42 g · 51.38 g · 51.44 g · 51.40 g
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 51.44 g − 51.38 g = 0.06 g
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (51.42 + 51.38 + 51.44 + 51.40) ÷ 4 = 205.64 ÷ 4 = 51.41 g
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

trials: 51.42 g · 51.38 g · 51.44 g · 51.40 g
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 51.44 g − 51.38 g = 0.06 g
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (51.42 + 51.38 + 51.44 + 51.40) ÷ 4 = 205.64 ÷ 4 = 51.41 g
Step 4 · Judge accuracy
error: 51.41 g − 50.00 g = 1.41 g high
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

trials: 51.42 g · 51.38 g · 51.44 g · 51.40 g
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 51.44 g − 51.38 g = 0.06 g
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (51.42 + 51.38 + 51.44 + 51.40) ÷ 4 = 205.64 ÷ 4 = 51.41 g
Step 4 · Judge accuracy
error: 51.41 g − 50.00 g = 1.41 g high
Precise but not accurate. All four trials carry the same 1.41-g error, and agreement between trials cannot expose an error they all share.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — boiling water

trials: 97.9 °C · 102.1 °C · 99.6 °C · 100.4 °C
true value: 100.0 °C (water boils at sea level) · wanted: both verdicts

A thermometer is read four times in boiling water at sea level.

A common first answer: the readings all land near the true 100.0 °C, so they are precise. Test it against the two definitions.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

trials: 97.9 °C · 102.1 °C · 99.6 °C · 100.4 °C
true value: 100.0 °C

Step 1 · Compute the range

range: 102.1 °C − 97.9 °C = 4.2 °C
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

trials: 97.9 °C · 102.1 °C · 99.6 °C · 100.4 °C
true value: 100.0 °C
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 102.1 °C − 97.9 °C = 4.2 °C
Step 2 · Judge precision

The trials disagree by up to 4.2 °C. Not precise. Precision compares the trials with one another; the true value is not part of that comparison.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

trials: 97.9 °C · 102.1 °C · 99.6 °C · 100.4 °C
true value: 100.0 °C
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 102.1 °C − 97.9 °C = 4.2 °C
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (97.9 + 102.1 + 99.6 + 100.4) ÷ 4 = 400.0 ÷ 4 = 100.0 °C
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

trials: 97.9 °C · 102.1 °C · 99.6 °C · 100.4 °C
true value: 100.0 °C
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 102.1 °C − 97.9 °C = 4.2 °C
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (97.9 + 102.1 + 99.6 + 100.4) ÷ 4 = 400.0 ÷ 4 = 100.0 °C
Step 4 · Judge accuracy

The average equals the true value. Accurate. Nearness to the true value is accuracy's comparison, the one the first answer called precision.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

trials: 97.9 °C · 102.1 °C · 99.6 °C · 100.4 °C
true value: 100.0 °C
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 102.1 °C − 97.9 °C = 4.2 °C
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (97.9 + 102.1 + 99.6 + 100.4) ÷ 4 = 400.0 ÷ 4 = 100.0 °C
Step 4 · Judge accuracy
Accurate but not precise. Random errors land high and low with equal chance; in the average they cancel.
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: two separate comparisons

trials: 97.9 · 102.1 · 99.6 · 100.4 °C — true value 100.0 °C
range 4.2 °C → not precise · average 100.0 °C on the true value → accurate

Precision compares the trials with one another and never mentions the true value. Accuracy compares the average with the true value and never mentions the spread. Swapping the two comparisons flips the verdict.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — density of an aluminum sample

trials: 2.41 · 2.43 · 2.40 · 2.42 g/cm³
true density of aluminum: 2.70 g/cm³
range: 2.43 − 2.40 = g/cm³ · average: (2.41 + 2.43 + 2.40 + 2.42) ÷ 4 = g/cm³

Both verdicts:

Compute the range and the average, then make each comparison.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — density of an aluminum sample

trials: 2.41 · 2.43 · 2.40 · 2.42 g/cm³
true density of aluminum: 2.70 g/cm³
range: 2.43 − 2.40 = g/cm³ · average: (2.41 + 2.43 + 2.40 + 2.42) ÷ 4 = g/cm³

Both verdicts:

Compute the range and the average, then make each comparison.

range: 2.43 − 2.40 = 0.03 g/cm³ → the trials agree: precise
average: 9.66 ÷ 4 = 2.415 g/cm³ → 0.285 below 2.70: not accurate

Precise but not accurate.

Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

Swapping the definitions. Trials of 97.9–102.1 °C averaging 100.0 °C get called "precise, since the average is right." An average on the true value is accuracy. Precision is agreement among the trials: range 4.2 °C → not precise.
Judging the set by one trial. In 51.42, 51.38, 51.44, 51.40 g against a true 50.00 g, trial 2 sits 51.38 − 50.00 = 1.38 g from the true mass — yet the set is precise: range 0.06 g. Both verdicts describe the whole set, never one reading.
Counting digits as accuracy. A caliper reads 14.42 cm, four significant figures, on a rod whose true length is 15.00 cm: the reading is 0.58 cm short. Digits show how finely the scale reads, not whether the reading is right.
Treating precise as accurate. Four readings within 0.06 g of one another all sit 1.41 g above the true mass. Agreement rules out scatter; it cannot rule out an error shared by every trial.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

trials: 26.32 mL · 26.28 mL · 26.34 mL · 26.30 mL
true volume: 25.00 mL

A pipette made to deliver 25.00 mL is tested four times. Which statement gives both verdicts?

  1. Accurate but not precise: agreement within 0.06 mL makes the trials accurate, and the 1.31-mL gap from the true volume makes them imprecise.
  2. Not precise: trial 2, at 26.28 mL, sits 1.28 mL from the true volume, and one reading that far off rules out precision.
  3. Precise but not accurate: the trials agree within 0.06 mL, and their average of 26.31 mL is 1.31 mL above the true volume.
  4. Accurate: every reading carries four significant figures, and readings that fine are accurate by definition.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: C

trials: 26.32 mL · 26.28 mL · 26.34 mL · 26.30 mL
true volume: 25.00 mL
range: 26.34 − 26.28 = 0.06 mL → the trials agree: precise
average: (26.32 + 26.28 + 26.34 + 26.30) ÷ 4 = 26.31 mL → 1.31 mL high: not accurate — answer C

A swapped the definitions: the 0.06-mL agreement is precision, and the 1.31-mL miss is inaccuracy. B judged the set by one trial: 26.28 − 25.00 = 1.28 mL compares a single reading with the true value, which is accuracy's comparison. D counted digits: significant figures report how finely the pipette is read, and every reading is still about 1.3 mL high.

Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: C

trials: 26.32 mL · 26.28 mL · 26.34 mL · 26.30 mL
true volume: 25.00 mL
range: 26.34 − 26.28 = 0.06 mL → the trials agree: precise
average: (26.32 + 26.28 + 26.34 + 26.30) ÷ 4 = 26.31 mL → 1.31 mL high: not accurate — answer C
All four deliveries run high by nearly the same amount. A flaw in the pipette itself repeats identically in every trial. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — one trial near the true value

trials: 9.58 g · 10.44 g · 9.96 g · 10.02 g
true value: 10.00 g (metal block of known mass) · wanted: both verdicts

A block of known mass is weighed four times on a worn balance.

A common first answer: trial 4 reads 10.02 g, within 0.02 g of the true mass, so the work is precise and accurate. Test it against the two definitions.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

trials: 9.58 g · 10.44 g · 9.96 g · 10.02 g
true value: 10.00 g

Step 1 · Compute the range

range: 10.44 g − 9.58 g = 0.86 g
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

trials: 9.58 g · 10.44 g · 9.96 g · 10.02 g
true value: 10.00 g
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 10.44 g − 9.58 g = 0.86 g
Step 2 · Judge precision

The trials spread across 0.86 g on a 10-g mass. Not precise. No single trial, however close to 10.00 g, can change a verdict about the spread.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

trials: 9.58 g · 10.44 g · 9.96 g · 10.02 g
true value: 10.00 g
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 10.44 g − 9.58 g = 0.86 g
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (9.58 + 10.44 + 9.96 + 10.02) ÷ 4 = 40.00 ÷ 4 = 10.00 g
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

trials: 9.58 g · 10.44 g · 9.96 g · 10.02 g
true value: 10.00 g
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 10.44 g − 9.58 g = 0.86 g
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (9.58 + 10.44 + 9.96 + 10.02) ÷ 4 = 40.00 ÷ 4 = 10.00 g
Step 4 · Judge accuracy

The average equals the true mass. Accurate because the whole set averages onto 10.00 g, not because trial 4 landed close.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

trials: 9.58 g · 10.44 g · 9.96 g · 10.02 g
true value: 10.00 g
Step 1 · Compute the range
range: 10.44 g − 9.58 g = 0.86 g
Step 2 · Judge precision Step 3 · Compute the average
average: (9.58 + 10.44 + 9.96 + 10.02) ÷ 4 = 40.00 ÷ 4 = 10.00 g
Step 4 · Judge accuracy
Accurate but not precise. One near-hit inside a 0.86-g scatter is chance; both verdicts describe the whole set.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

trials: 14.5 cm · 15.6 cm · 15.0 cm · 14.9 cm
true length: 15.00 cm

A rod machined to a length of 15.00 cm is measured four times with a tape measure. Which statement gives both verdicts?

  1. Precise: trial 3 reads 15.0 cm, exactly the true length, and a reading on the true value shows the technique repeats well.
  2. Accurate but not precise: the average of 15.0 cm equals the true length, while the trials disagree by up to 1.1 cm.
  3. Precise but not accurate: an average on the true value shows precision, and the 1.1-cm spread shows the results are inaccurate.
  4. Precise: all four lengths are read to a tenth of a centimeter, and readings reported to the same decimal place are precise.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: B

trials: 14.5 cm · 15.6 cm · 15.0 cm · 14.9 cm
true length: 15.00 cm
range: 15.6 − 14.5 = 1.1 cm → the trials disagree: not precise
average: (14.5 + 15.6 + 15.0 + 14.9) ÷ 4 = 15.0 cm → on the true length: accurate — answer B

A judged the set by one trial: one reading inside a 1.1-cm scatter, and precision comes from the whole set's range. C swapped the definitions: the on-target average is accuracy; the 1.1-cm spread is imprecision. D counted digits: the decimal place shows how finely the tape reads, not whether the trials repeat.

Range → precision; average vs true value → accuracy. One on-target trial changes neither verdict. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. Four trials have a range of 0.04 g, and their average sits 2.1 g below the true value. Give both verdicts.
  2. A single reading lands exactly on the true value. What does that establish about the set's precision?

Every trial in these sets was recorded to a fixed decimal place. How many digits a measurement may claim is its own rule set: significant figures.

Dr. Karmach

3 · Significant Figures

Count the significant figures in any measurement, and round a calculated result with the rule that matches the operation.

Dr. Karmach

Reading an instrument

The cylinder is marked every 1 mL. The water sits most of the way from 36 to 37: record 36.8 mL. The 3 and 6 are certain; the 8 is estimated.

Dr. Karmach

A measurement's digits record its certainty

36.8 mL
3, 6 certain · 8 estimated — the true volume lies between 36.7 and 36.9 mL

An instrument reports every digit it can distinguish, plus one estimated digit. Those digits are the significant figures. Writing 36.8 mL states the volume is known to the tenths and no further.

Dr. Karmach

A better instrument gives more digits

36.8 mL — graduated cylinder
estimated in the tenths → 3 sig figs
36.82 mL — burette
estimated in the hundredths → 4 sig figs

A burette marks every 0.1 mL, so its estimate lands in the hundredths. Recording 36.82 mL from a cylinder marked in whole milliliters claims a digit that was never measured.

Dr. Karmach

Exact numbers

24 tablets  ·  1 kg = 1000 g
counted · defined — no estimated digit — exact, unlimited sig figs
24.31 g
measured — the final 1 is estimated — 4 sig figs

Counted objects and defined relationships are not measurements. Nothing in them is estimated, so they have unlimited significant figures. Only measured values limit a result.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Nonzero digits always count.
  2. Captive zeros (between nonzero digits) always count.
  3. Leading zeros (before the first nonzero digit) never count.
  4. Trailing zeros count only with a decimal point.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — a mass from the balance

0.04030 g
read from an analytical balance

An analytical balance reports the mass of a powder sample. Count the significant figures: test each digit against the four rules.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

0.04030 g
read from an analytical balance

Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count

The 4 and the 3 count.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

0.04030 g
read from an analytical balance
Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count Step 2 · Captive zeros always count

The zero between 4 and 3 counts.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

0.04030 g
read from an analytical balance
Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count Step 2 · Captive zeros always count Step 3 · Leading zeros never count

The two zeros in front only locate the decimal point.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

0.04030 g
read from an analytical balance
Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count Step 2 · Captive zeros always count Step 3 · Leading zeros never count Step 4 · Trailing zeros count only with a decimal point

The number has a decimal point, so the final zero counts.

0.04030 g → 4 sig figs
counted: 4, 0, 3, 0 · not counted: the two leading zeros
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

0.04030 g
read from an analytical balance
Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count Step 2 · Captive zeros always count Step 3 · Leading zeros never count Step 4 · Trailing zeros count only with a decimal point
0.04030 g → 4 sig figs
counted: 4, 0, 3, 0 · not counted: the two leading zeros
In scientific notation the placeholders vanish: 4.030 × 10⁻² g shows exactly the four significant digits.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — a scale with no decimal point

1200 kg
a truck-scale reading — no decimal point

A truck scale reports the mass of a loaded pallet. A common first attempt: four written digits, four significant figures. Test it against the rules.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

1200 kg
a truck-scale reading — no decimal point

Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count

The 1 and the 2 count.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

1200 kg
a truck-scale reading — no decimal point
Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count Step 2 · Captive zeros always count Step 3 · Leading zeros never count

No zero sits between nonzero digits, and none leads. Neither rule applies here.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

1200 kg
a truck-scale reading — no decimal point
Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count Step 2 · Captive zeros always count Step 3 · Leading zeros never count Step 4 · Trailing zeros count only with a decimal point

There is no decimal point. The two zeros are placeholders.

1200 kg → 2 sig figs
counted: 1, 2 · placeholders: 0, 0 — the four-digit count fails Step 4
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

1200 kg
a truck-scale reading — no decimal point
Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count Step 2 · Captive zeros always count Step 3 · Leading zeros never count Step 4 · Trailing zeros count only with a decimal point
1200 kg → 2 sig figs
counted: 1, 2 · placeholders: 0, 0 — the four-digit count fails Step 4
Written with a decimal point, the same digits all count:
1200. kg → 4 sig figs  ·  1.20 × 10³ kg → 3 sig figs
the decimal point makes trailing zeros count · the coefficient shows only significant digits
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

1200 kg
a truck-scale reading — no decimal point
Step 1 · Nonzero digits always count Step 2 · Captive zeros always count Step 3 · Leading zeros never count Step 4 · Trailing zeros count only with a decimal point
1200 kg → 2 sig figs
counted: 1, 2 · placeholders: 0, 0 — the four-digit count fails Step 4
1200. kg → 4 sig figs  ·  1.20 × 10³ kg → 3 sig figs
the decimal point makes trailing zeros count · the coefficient shows only significant digits
Two sig figs: the thousands digit is certain, the hundreds digit is the estimate. Nothing in 1200 records the tens or ones.
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: trailing zeros need a decimal point

1200 kg, 1200. kg, and 1.20 × 10³ kg describe the same load with different certainty. To mark a trailing zero significant, write the decimal point or use scientific notation.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — count the sig figs

measurement sig figs
0.0250 L
305.0 g
8700 m

The decimal point decides every trailing zero.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — count the sig figs

measurement sig figs
0.0250 L
305.0 g
8700 m

The decimal point decides every trailing zero.

0.0250 L → 3  ·  305.0 g → 4  ·  8700 m → 2
trailing zero after a decimal point counts · captive and trailing count · no decimal point — placeholders
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

Counting trailing zeros with no decimal point. 2600 kg reads as four sig figs. Step 4 gives two: the zeros only hold place. Written 2600. kg, it has four.
Counting the leading zeros. In 0.0250 L, starting the count at the zeros gives 4 or 5. Leading zeros only locate the decimal point: 3 sig figs.
Dropping the trailing zero after a decimal point. The final zero of 0.0250 L was measured, and the decimal point makes it count: 3 sig figs, not 2.
Counting every written digit. 0.0250 L shows five digits but 3 sig figs. A digit is significant when it was measured, not when it is written.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

0.02060 g
the mass of a grain of rice on an analytical balance

How many significant figures does the measurement carry?

  1. 3 significant figures
  2. 4 significant figures
  3. 5 significant figures
  4. 6 significant figures
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: B

0.02060 g → 4 sig figs — answer B
counted: 2, 0, 6, 0 · not counted: the two leading zeros

The 2 and 6 count, the captive zero between them counts, and the decimal point makes the final zero count. A dropped the trailing zero: 3. C started counting at the first zero after the decimal point: 5. D counted every written digit: 6.

Scientific notation strips the placeholders: 2.060 × 10⁻² g keeps exactly four digits.
Dr. Karmach

Rounding off

7.8342 → 7.83
first dropped digit 4 — below 5, the kept digit stays
0.4267 → 0.43
first dropped digit 6 — 5 or more, the kept digit rounds up

A calculator returns more digits than a measurement supports. Keep the significant ones and look at the first digit dropped: below 5, keep; 5 or more, round up.

Dr. Karmach

Multiplication and division: fewest sig figs

4.20 × 1.1 = 4.62 → 4.6
3 sig figs × 2 sig figs → report 2 sig figs

A result can be no more certain than its least certain measurement. For multiplication and division, the answer keeps the fewest sig figs found among the inputs.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — volume of a block

8.5 cm × 4.27 cm × 1.36 cm
given: three measured edges · wanted: the volume, correctly reported

A metal block's three edges are measured. Compute the volume and report it with the correct number of sig figs.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

8.5 cm × 4.27 cm × 1.36 cm
sig figs: 2 · 3 · 3

Count each factor's sig figs

8.5 carries two; 4.27 and 1.36 carry three each. The fewest is two.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

8.5 cm × 4.27 cm × 1.36 cm
sig figs: 2 · 3 · 3
Count each factor's sig figs Multiply, then round to the fewest
8.5 × 4.27 × 1.36 = 49.3612 cm³ (calculator) → 49 cm³
reported to 2 sig figs — set by the 8.5
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

8.5 cm × 4.27 cm × 1.36 cm
sig figs: 2 · 3 · 3
Count each factor's sig figs Multiply, then round to the fewest
8.5 × 4.27 × 1.36 = 49.3612 cm³ (calculator) → 49 cm³
reported to 2 sig figs — set by the 8.5
The 8.5 cm edge was estimated in the tenths. Two sig figs is everything those rulers measured; the calculator's extra digits were never measured at all.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 4 — adding two volumes

108.2 mL + 1.66 mL
graduated cylinder (tenths) + burette (hundredths)

A burette adds 1.66 mL to the 108.2 mL already in a flask. A common first attempt: 1.66 has the fewest sig figs, three, so report 110. mL. Test it.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 4 — solution

108.2 mL + 1.66 mL
graduated cylinder (tenths) + burette (hundredths)

A common first attempt

108.2 + 1.66 = 109.86 → 110. mL
the multiplication rule applied to a sum ✗

Rounding to three sig figs threw away the tenths digit the cylinder measured. Addition and subtraction do not count sig figs.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 4 — solution

108.2 mL + 1.66 mL
graduated cylinder (tenths) + burette (hundredths)
A common first attempt
108.2 + 1.66 = 109.86 → 110. mL
the multiplication rule applied to a sum ✗
Round to the least precise decimal place

The cylinder is estimated in the tenths, the burette in the hundredths. The sum ends where the least precise input ends: the tenths.

108.2 + 1.66 = 109.86 → 109.9 mL
rounded to the tenths, the least precise place given ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 4 — solution

108.2 mL + 1.66 mL
graduated cylinder (tenths) + burette (hundredths)
A common first attempt
108.2 + 1.66 = 109.86 → 110. mL
the multiplication rule applied to a sum ✗
Round to the least precise decimal place
108.2 + 1.66 = 109.86 → 109.9 mL
rounded to the tenths, the least precise place given ✓
Four sig figs survive even though one input carried three. Addition sets the answer's last decimal place; the sig-fig count follows from it.
Dr. Karmach

Match the rule to the operation

Do: for × and ÷, keep the fewest sig figs.

8.5 × 4.27 × 1.36 = 49 cm³
fewest sig figs among the factors: two ✓

Do not: carry that rule into + and −. Round to the least precise decimal place.

108.2 + 1.66 → 110. mL ✗  ·  109.9 mL ✓
sig-fig count applied to a sum ✗ — a sum rounds to the tenths
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

36.52 mL + 5.8 mL + 0.463 mL
burette + graduated cylinder + micropipette

Three portions of water are combined from three different instruments. What total volume should be reported?

  1. 42.783 mL
  2. 42.8 mL
  3. 43 mL
  4. 42.78 mL
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: B

36.52 + 5.8 + 0.463 = 42.783 → 42.8 mL — answer B
least precise place: the tenths, from 5.8

The 5.8 mL is estimated in the tenths, so the sum ends at the tenths. A kept every calculator digit: 42.783. C applied the multiplication rule, two sig figs from 5.8: 43. D rounded to the hundredths, a place the graduated cylinder never measured: 42.78.

One coarse measurement sets the whole sum's last place. The micropipette's 0.463 mL is real, but a sum with a tenths-place measurement ends at the tenths.
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A balance reads 25.10 g. How many sig figs, and which digit is the estimate?
  2. 4.6 × 1.23 and 4.6 + 1.23: which rule rounds each result, and to what?

These rules follow every measurement through every calculation. Unit conversions chain measurements with exact conversion factors — exact numbers never limit sig figs, so the measurement's certainty sets the answer's.

Dr. Karmach

4 · Dimensional Analysis

Convert a measurement into any unit by chaining conversion factors, each one picked so the unit before it cancels.

Dr. Karmach

Same number, wrong unit

The Mars Climate Orbiter was lost in 1999. One team reported thruster impulse in pound-seconds and the software read newton-seconds. It flew too low and broke apart.

Dr. Karmach

A conversion factor equals 1

1 m = 100 cm
one length, two names

An equality names one amount two ways. Written as a fraction, top matches bottom, so the fraction equals 1. Multiplying by 1 changes the unit, never the quantity.

1 m100 cm = 1 · 100 cm1 m = 1 — every equality gives two factors
Dr. Karmach

Units cancel like symbols in algebra

A unit on top cancels the same unit below. The right factor removes the given unit and leaves the wanted one.

given unit A × wanted unit Bunit A = answer, in unit B
Dr. Karmach

Metric prefixes are equalities

Each prefix defines an equality with any base unit: 1 km = 10³ m, 1 mg = 10⁻³ g, 1 ms = 10⁻³ s. One table covers every metric conversion.

Dr. Karmach

The unit plan

Sketch the route from the given unit to the wanted unit before any arithmetic. One conversion factor per arrow. When no single equality links them, the route runs through units in between.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Write the given: number and unit.
  2. Pick the factor that cancels its unit: the given unit goes in the denominator.
  3. Multiply; repeat until the wanted unit survives.
  4. Sense-check the size and the surviving unit.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1

Step 1 · Write the given

1 m = 100 cm
given: 347 cm · wanted: m

A whiteboard measures 347 cm across. Express the width in meters.

A common first attempt uses the factor written 100 cm over 1 m. Test it.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

1 m = 100 cm
given: 347 cm · wanted: m

One conversion factor is needed.

A common first attempt

347 cm × 100 cm1 m = 34,700 cm²/m ✗

No unit cancels, and the answer is not in meters.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

1 m = 100 cm
given: 347 cm · wanted: m
A common first attempt
347 cm × 100 cm1 m = 34,700 cm²/m ✗
Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit

Both factors come from the same equality, and both equal 1. Only one cancels the given unit:

1 m100 cm cancels cm ✓    100 cm1 m cancels nothing ✗
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

1 m = 100 cm
given: 347 cm · wanted: m
A common first attempt
347 cm × 100 cm1 m = 34,700 cm²/m ✗
Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit Step 3 · Multiply; repeat until the wanted unit survives

One factor completes the plan: cm cancels, m survives.

347 cm × 1 m100 cm = 3.47 m
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

1 m = 100 cm
given: 347 cm · wanted: m
A common first attempt
347 cm × 100 cm1 m = 34,700 cm²/m ✗
Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit Step 3 · Multiply; repeat until the wanted unit survives
347 cm × 1 m100 cm = 3.47 m
A meter holds 100 cm, so the count in meters must be smaller: 347 → 3.47. The width itself is unchanged. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: only one orientation cancels

Do: the given unit in the denominator, so it cancels.

347 cm × (1 m / 100 cm) = 3.47 m
cm cancels · m survives ✓

Do not: the given unit on top. Nothing cancels; the factor is inverted.

347 cm × (100 cm / 1 m) = 34,700 cm²/m
no unit cancels — flip the factor ✗
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2

Step 1 · Write the given

1 µm = 10⁻⁶ m · 1 mm = 10⁻³ m
given: 45 µm · wanted: mm

A fine human hair measures 45 µm across. Express the width in millimeters.

No single equality links µm to mm. The unit plan runs through the base unit: µm → m → mm.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

1 µm = 10⁻⁶ m · 1 mm = 10⁻³ m
given: 45 µm · wanted: mm · plan: µm → m → mm

Two conversion factors are needed.

Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit

The prefix equality gives the first factor, with µm in the denominator:

45 µm × 10⁻⁶ m1 µm = 4.5 × 10⁻⁵ m
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

1 µm = 10⁻⁶ m · 1 mm = 10⁻³ m
given: 45 µm · wanted: mm · plan: µm → m → mm
Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit
45 µm × 10⁻⁶ m1 µm = 4.5 × 10⁻⁵ m
Step 3 · Multiply; repeat until the wanted unit survives

The result is in meters, not the wanted millimeters. The second factor cancels m and leaves mm:

45 µm × 10⁻⁶ m1 µm × 1 mm10⁻³ m = 0.045 mm
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

1 µm = 10⁻⁶ m · 1 mm = 10⁻³ m
given: 45 µm · wanted: mm · plan: µm → m → mm
Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit
45 µm × 10⁻⁶ m1 µm = 4.5 × 10⁻⁵ m
Step 3 · Multiply; repeat until the wanted unit survives
45 µm × 10⁻⁶ m1 µm × 1 mm10⁻³ m = 0.045 mm
A millimeter holds 1000 µm, so the count drops by 1000: 45 → 0.045. A hair is thinner than a millimeter. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — feet to centimeters

1 ft = 12 in · 1 in = 2.54 cm
given: 6.00 ft · wanted: cm

A doorway stands 6.00 ft tall. The unit plan: ft → in → cm.

6.00 ft × 12 in1 ft × cm in = cm

Fill the second factor from 1 in = 2.54 cm, then compute.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — feet to centimeters

1 ft = 12 in · 1 in = 2.54 cm
given: 6.00 ft · wanted: cm

A doorway stands 6.00 ft tall. The unit plan: ft → in → cm.

6.00 ft × 12 in1 ft × cm in = cm

Fill the second factor from 1 in = 2.54 cm, then compute.

6.00 ft × 12 in1 ft × 2.54 cm1 in = 183 cm
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

Inverting the factor. 347 cm × (100 cm / 1 m) = 34,700 cm²/m. No unit cancels, and the answer is not in meters. If the units do not cancel, the factor is inverted: the correct setup gives 3.47 m.
Stopping mid-plan. The plan µm → m → mm has two arrows. Stopping after one gives 4.5 × 10⁻⁵ m — meters, not the wanted millimeters. The chain ends at 0.045 mm.
Calculating without a plan. On a multi-step chain, write the route first: given unit → … → wanted unit. Each arrow names the factor to pick; a skipped arrow shows up as a unit that will not cancel.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

1 mL = 10⁻³ L · 1 gal = 3.7854 L
given: 2500 mL · wanted: gal

A soft-drink bottle holds 2500 mL. What is its volume in gallons?

  1. 2.50 gal
  2. 0.660 gal
  3. 9.46 gal
  4. 660 gal
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: B

1 mL = 10⁻³ L · 1 gal = 3.7854 L
given: 2500 mL · plan: mL → L → gal
2500 mL × 10⁻³ L1 mL × 1 gal3.7854 L = 0.660 gal — answer B

A stopped mid-plan: 2500 mL is 2.50 L, and liters are not gallons. C flipped the gallon factor: 2500/1000 × 3.7854 = 9.46. D treated milliliters as liters: 2500/3.7854 = 660.

A gallon is nearly four liters. The bottle holds 2.50 L, less than one gallon: 0.660. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — a rate as a conversion factor

Step 1 · Write the given

1 mL = 10⁻³ L · 1 gal = 3.7854 L · 0.62137 mi = 1 km
given: 1500 mL of gasoline · this car: 32 mi = 1 gal · wanted: km

A car gets 32 miles per gallon. How many kilometers can it travel on 1500 mL of gasoline?

Mileage is an equality for this car: 32 mi = 1 gal. It converts like any other factor. The unit plan: mL → L → gal → mi → km.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

1 mL = 10⁻³ L · 1 gal = 3.7854 L · 32 mi = 1 gal · 0.62137 mi = 1 km
given: 1500 mL · plan: mL → L → gal → mi → km

Four conversion factors are needed, one per arrow of the plan.

Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit

The first arrow removes mL. The prefix equality gives the factor, with mL in the denominator:

1500 mL × 10⁻³ L1 mL = 1.5 L
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

1 mL = 10⁻³ L · 1 gal = 3.7854 L · 32 mi = 1 gal · 0.62137 mi = 1 km
given: 1500 mL · plan: mL → L → gal → mi → km
Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit
1500 mL × 10⁻³ L1 mL = 1.5 L
Step 3 · Multiply; repeat until the wanted unit survives

Each factor cancels the unit left by the one before. The chain ends when km survives:

1500 mL × 10⁻³ L1 mL × 1 gal3.7854 L × 32 mi1 gal × 1 km0.62137 mi = 20.4 km
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

1 mL = 10⁻³ L · 1 gal = 3.7854 L · 32 mi = 1 gal · 0.62137 mi = 1 km
given: 1500 mL · plan: mL → L → gal → mi → km
Step 2 · Pick the factor that cancels its unit
1500 mL × 10⁻³ L1 mL = 1.5 L
Step 3 · Multiply; repeat until the wanted unit survives
1500 mL × 10⁻³ L1 mL × 1 gal3.7854 L × 32 mi1 gal × 1 km0.62137 mi = 20.4 km
1500 mL is 1.5 L, under half a gallon: about 12.7 mi of driving. A kilometer is shorter than a mile, so the count in kilometers reads larger: 20.4. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

1 mL = 10⁻³ L · 1 gal = 3.7854 L · 0.62137 mi = 1 km
given: 2000 mL of gasoline · this car: 44 mi = 1 gal · wanted: km

A car gets 44 miles per gallon. How many kilometers can it travel on 2000 mL of gasoline?

  1. 23.2 km
  2. 3.74 × 10⁴ km
  3. 37.4 km
  4. 536 km
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: C

1 mL = 10⁻³ L · 1 gal = 3.7854 L · 44 mi = 1 gal · 0.62137 mi = 1 km
given: 2000 mL · plan: mL → L → gal → mi → km
2000 mL × 10⁻³ L1 mL × 1 gal3.7854 L × 44 mi1 gal × 1 km0.62137 mi = 37.4 km — answer C

A stopped at miles: 2000/1000/3.7854 × 44 = 23.2, a count of mi, not km. B treated milliliters as liters: 1000 times too large, 3.74 × 10⁴. D flipped the gallon factor: 2000/1000 × 3.7854 × 44 / 0.62137 = 536.

2000 mL is about half a gallon, and half of 44 mi is 22 mi. The count in kilometers reads larger: 37.4. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. From 1 in = 2.54 cm, write both conversion factors. Which one converts 30.0 cm to inches?
  2. Multiplying by a conversion factor changes the unit but never the amount. What does every conversion factor equal?

Density is the next conversion factor: an equality between a substance's mass and its volume, in grams per milliliter. Molar mass and mole ratios follow. Every one converts on this same rail.

Dr. Karmach

5 · Density as a Conversion Factor

Use a density to convert between the mass and the volume of a material, alone or chained with other conversion factors on one rail.

Dr. Karmach

Same volume, different mass

Three cubes, the same 1 mL of space. Water: 1.00 g. Aluminum: 2.70 g. Lead: 11.34 g. Each material packs its own mass into a milliliter.

Dr. Karmach

Density: mass per milliliter

ethanol 0.789 · water 1.00 · aluminum 2.70 · iron 7.87 · silver 10.5 · gold 19.3
density in g/mL — the mass, in grams, that fills 1 mL of the material

Each material packs a fixed mass into each milliliter. That rate, in grams per milliliter, is its density — a physical property. A measured density identifies the material.

Dr. Karmach

A density is an equality

19.3 g of gold = 1 mL of gold
density of gold: 19.3 g/mL

Every equality gives a conversion factor. This one converts between mass and volume:

19.3 g Au1 mL Au or 1 mL Au19.3 g Au

Write it so the given unit cancels.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Map the route: given unit → desired unit.
  2. Start with the given.
  3. Write the density fraction so the unit to cancel sits in the denominator.
  4. Multiply and check that only the desired unit survives.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — mass from volume

Step 1 · Map the route

13.6 g Hg = 1 mL Hg
given: 15.0 mL · wanted: g · route: mL → g

A sealed glass ampule holds 15.0 mL of mercury. What is the mass of the mercury inside?

Set it up: which orientation of the density fraction cancels mL?

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

13.6 g Hg = 1 mL Hg
given: 15.0 mL · wanted: g · route: mL → g

One conversion factor is needed.

Step 2 · Start with the given

The given is 15.0 mL, so the fraction must cancel milliliters.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

13.6 g Hg = 1 mL Hg
given: 15.0 mL · wanted: g · route: mL → g
Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction

Milliliters go in the denominator: 13.6 g over 1 mL.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

13.6 g Hg = 1 mL Hg
given: 15.0 mL · wanted: g · route: mL → g
Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction Step 4 · Multiply and check
15.0 mL Hg × 13.6 g Hg1 mL Hg = 204 g Hg
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

13.6 g Hg = 1 mL Hg
given: 15.0 mL · wanted: g · route: mL → g
Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction Step 4 · Multiply and check
15.0 mL Hg × 13.6 g Hg1 mL Hg = 204 g Hg
Water in the same ampule would weigh 15.0 g. Mercury packs 13.6 times the mass into every milliliter: 204 g. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — volume from mass

Step 1 · Map the route

19.3 g Au = 1 mL Au
given: 25.0 g · wanted: mL · route: g → mL

A pendant contains 25.0 g of gold. What volume of gold is that?

A common first attempt: multiply by the density fraction as written, 19.3 g over 1 mL. Test the units.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

19.3 g Au = 1 mL Au
given: 25.0 g · wanted: mL · route: g → mL

A common first attempt

25.0 g Au × 19.3 g Au1 mL Au = 483 g²/mL ✗

Nothing cancels, and no quantity carries g²/mL. The fraction is upside down.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

19.3 g Au = 1 mL Au
given: 25.0 g · wanted: mL · route: g → mL
A common first attempt
25.0 g Au × 19.3 g Au1 mL Au = 483 g²/mL ✗
Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction

The given unit is grams, so grams belong in the denominator. Flip the fraction: 1 mL over 19.3 g.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

19.3 g Au = 1 mL Au
given: 25.0 g · wanted: mL · route: g → mL
A common first attempt
25.0 g Au × 19.3 g Au1 mL Au = 483 g²/mL ✗
Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction Step 4 · Multiply and check
25.0 g Au × 1 mL Au19.3 g Au = 1.30 mL Au
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

19.3 g Au = 1 mL Au
given: 25.0 g · wanted: mL · route: g → mL
A common first attempt
25.0 g Au × 19.3 g Au1 mL Au = 483 g²/mL ✗
Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction Step 4 · Multiply and check
25.0 g Au × 1 mL Au19.3 g Au = 1.30 mL Au
Gold packs 19.3 g into each milliliter, so 25.0 g fits in barely more than one: 1.30 mL. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: the units test the setup

25.0 g × 19.3 g1 mL = 483 g²/mL ✗ — not a volume
25.0 g × 1 mL19.3 g = 1.30 mL ✓

There is no multiply-or-divide rule to memorize. Write the fraction so the given unit cancels. A flipped fraction leaves units no quantity carries.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — ethanol

0.789 g ethanol = 1 mL ethanol
given: 50.0 g · wanted: mL

A hand-sanitizer recipe calls for 50.0 g of ethanol, measured out by volume.

50.0 g × mL g = mL

Fill the fraction so grams cancel, then compute.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — ethanol

0.789 g ethanol = 1 mL ethanol
given: 50.0 g · wanted: mL

A hand-sanitizer recipe calls for 50.0 g of ethanol, measured out by volume.

50.0 g × mL g = mL

Fill the fraction so grams cancel, then compute.

50.0 g × 1 mL0.789 g = 63.4 mL
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

Flipping the density fraction. 25.0 g × (19.3 g / 1 mL) = 483 g²/mL. Nothing cancels, and no quantity carries g²/mL. Put the unit to cancel in the denominator: 25.0 g × (1 mL / 19.3 g) = 1.30 mL.
Rearranging d = m/V from memory. A misremembered rearrangement gives 13.6 ÷ 15.0 = 0.907 g/mL², which is not a mass. No rearranging is needed: start with the given and multiply by the fraction that cancels its unit.
A slipped decimal. A correct setup can still be keyed in wrong: 20.4 g instead of 204 g. Estimate first. 15 mL at about 14 g per milliliter is near 210 g, so 20.4 g cannot be right.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

10.5 g Ag = 1 mL Ag
density of silver: 10.5 g/mL

A silversmith buys a 170 g silver ingot. What volume does the ingot occupy?

  1. 0.0618 mL
  2. 16.2 mL
  3. 1.62 mL
  4. 1790 mL
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: B

10.5 g Ag = 1 mL Ag
given: 170 g · wanted: mL · route: g → mL
170 g Ag × 1 mL Ag10.5 g Ag = 16.2 mL Ag — answer B

A divided the density by the mass: 10.5 ÷ 170 = 0.0618, and its units are not milliliters. C slipped a decimal: 170 ÷ 10.5 = 16.2, not 1.62. D flipped the fraction: 170 × 10.5 = 1790, with units of g²/mL.

Silver packs 10.5 g into each milliliter, so 170 g occupies far fewer milliliters than its grams: 16.2. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — an unknown metal

417 g of metal pellets · submerged, they raise the water level by 53.0 mL
given: 417 g and 53.0 mL · wanted: density, in g/mL

Candidate densities, in g/mL:

aluminum iron copper silver lead
2.70 7.87 8.96 10.5 11.34

A bin of unlabeled gray pellets arrives at a recycling yard. Density identifies the metal.

Build the density from the data, units in place, and match it to the table.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

417 g of metal pellets · 53.0 mL of water displaced
wanted: density, in g/mL

Build the fraction from the data

d = 417 g53.0 mL = 7.87 g/mL

Mass on top, volume underneath, units in place. The surviving unit, g/mL, is a density.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

417 g of metal pellets · 53.0 mL of water displaced
wanted: density, in g/mL
Build the fraction from the data
d = 417 g53.0 mL = 7.87 g/mL
Match the property
aluminum iron copper silver lead
2.70 7.87 8.96 10.5 11.34

Of the candidates, only iron matches 7.87 g/mL. The pellets are iron.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

417 g of metal pellets · 53.0 mL of water displaced
wanted: density, in g/mL
Build the fraction from the data
d = 417 g53.0 mL = 7.87 g/mL
Match the property
aluminum iron copper silver lead
2.70 7.87 8.96 10.5 11.34
The measured fraction is now a conversion factor for these pellets: 7.87 g over 1 mL converts volume to mass; flipped, mass to volume. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Density inside a longer route

Metric factors convert within mass or within volume. The density is the only factor that crosses between them. Map the route, then chain the factors on one rail.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 4 — kilograms to liters

Step 1 · Map the route

0.789 g ethanol = 1 mL ethanol
given: 2.50 kg · wanted: L · route: kg → g → mL → L

A stockroom order arrives: 2.50 kg of ethanol. The flammables cabinet is labeled in liters. How many liters is this?

The density carries only the g → mL arrow. Metric equalities carry the other two.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 4 — solution

0.789 g ethanol = 1 mL ethanol
given: 2.50 kg · wanted: L · route: kg → g → mL → L

Three conversion factors are needed.

Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction

The metric factor converts kilograms to grams. The density fraction, written 1 mL over 0.789 g, then cancels grams.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 4 — solution

0.789 g ethanol = 1 mL ethanol
given: 2.50 kg · wanted: L · route: kg → g → mL → L
Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction Step 4 · Multiply and check
2.50 kg × 1000 g1 kg × 1 mL0.789 g × 1 L1000 mL = 3.17 L
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 4 — solution

0.789 g ethanol = 1 mL ethanol
given: 2.50 kg · wanted: L · route: kg → g → mL → L
Step 2 · Start with the given Step 3 · Write the density fraction Step 4 · Multiply and check
2.50 kg × 1000 g1 kg × 1 mL0.789 g × 1 L1000 mL = 3.17 L
Ethanol is lighter than water. Water would give exactly 2.50 L; ethanol spreads the same mass over 3.17 L. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

13.6 g Hg = 1 mL Hg
density of mercury: 13.6 g/mL

A recycler drains 1.25 L of mercury from old thermostats. What mass, in kilograms, goes on the waste manifest?

  1. 0.0919 kg
  2. 1.70 kg
  3. 17.0 kg
  4. 0.0170 kg
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: C

13.6 g Hg = 1 mL Hg
given: 1.25 L · wanted: kg · route: L → mL → g → kg
1.25 L × 1000 mL1 L × 13.6 g1 mL × 1 kg1000 g = 17.0 kg — answer C

A flipped the density: 1250 ÷ 13.6 ÷ 1000 = 0.0919. B slipped a decimal: 17,000 g is 17.0 kg, not 1.70. D applied g/mL to liters without converting: 1.25 × 13.6 = 17.0 g, which is 0.0170 kg. The volume must become milliliters before the density applies.

Water would be 1.25 kg. Mercury carries 13.6 times the mass per milliliter: 1.25 × 13.6 = 17.0 kg. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. Iron: 7.87 g/mL. State the equality this declares, then write the fraction that converts grams of iron to milliliters.
  2. A route runs kg → g → mL → L. Which arrow is the density's, and why can no metric factor replace it?

Molar mass is the next factor of this kind: the grams in one mole of a substance. One fraction on the same rail converts a mass into a count of particles.

Dr. Karmach

Can you…?

  • ☐ classify matter as an element, a compound, or a mixture?
  • ☐ distinguish precision from accuracy in measured data?
  • ☐ report measurements and results with the correct significant figures?
  • ☐ convert units with conversion factors, canceling units at each step?
  • ☐ use density as a conversion factor between mass and volume?

If any box stays empty, the practice site has a drill for it. 🧪

Dr. Karmach

table end

table end

table end

table end

table end