Solutions

CHEM 50 — General Chemistry I · Dr. Karmach

build Jul 22 · 11:13 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · OpenStax Chemistry 2e where noted
Dr. Karmach

By the end of this unit, you can…

  • Explain "like dissolves like" and predict whether a solute dissolves in a given solvent
  • Describe unsaturated, saturated, and supersaturated solutions and read a solubility curve
  • Use the dilution relation M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ to find a concentration or volume
  • Calculate molality and mole fraction, and convert among molarity, molality, and mass percent
  • Apply colligative properties — freezing-point depression, boiling-point elevation, and Raoult's law — using the van't Hoff factor
  • Apply Henry's law to gas solubility and titration stoichiometry to find an unknown concentration
Dr. Karmach

Today's route 🗺️

  1. Like Dissolves Like
  2. Saturation & Solubility Curves
  3. Dilution
  4. Molality & Mole Fraction
  5. Converting Concentration Units
  6. Freezing Point & Boiling Point
  7. Raoult's Law
  8. Henry's Law
  9. Titration Calculations
Dr. Karmach

1 · Like Dissolves Like

Predict whether a solute dissolves in a given solvent by matching their attractions — polar and ionic solutes dissolve in polar solvents, nonpolar solutes in nonpolar solvents.

Dr. Karmach

Why oil won't mix but sugar vanishes

Shake oil and vinegar and they split back into two layers every time. Stir sugar into hot tea and it disappears completely.

Dr. Karmach

A solute dissolves by replacing attractions

The solute is what dissolves; the solvent is what it dissolves into. A solute dissolves only when new solute–solvent attractions can replace the solute–solute attractions being broken.

Dr. Karmach

Like dissolves like

Attractions match only when polarities match. A polar or ionic solute dissolves in a polar solvent like water. A nonpolar solute dissolves in a nonpolar solvent like oil or hexane.

Dr. Karmach

Why oil and water separate

Water molecules hold one another with strong hydrogen bonds. A nonpolar oil molecule attracts only weakly, too weak to enter that network. So the oil is pushed out into its own layer.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Find the solute's polarity. Ionic or polar, or nonpolar?
  2. Find the solvent's polarity. Polar like water, or nonpolar like oil or hexane?
  3. Match them. Same family dissolves. A mismatch stays separate.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — table salt in water

table salt (NaCl) stirred into water
ionic solid · 58.44 g/mol · water is a polar solvent

Table salt is an ionic solid, and water is a polar solvent. Predict whether the salt dissolves, and why.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

table salt (NaCl) stirred into water
ionic solid · 58.44 g/mol · water is a polar solvent

Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity

Salt is built from Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions. Their charge attracts polar molecules strongly, so ionic solutes belong with the polar family.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

table salt (NaCl) stirred into water
ionic solid · 58.44 g/mol · water is a polar solvent
Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity Step 2 · Find the solvent's polarity

Water is polar. Each molecule has a positive end and a negative end that can turn toward a charge.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

table salt (NaCl) stirred into water
ionic solid · 58.44 g/mol · water is a polar solvent
Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity Step 2 · Find the solvent's polarity Step 3 · Match them
ionic solute · polar solvent same family, it dissolves

Water molecules surround each ion, their charged ends replacing the pull the ions had on one another.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

table salt (NaCl) stirred into water
ionic solid · 58.44 g/mol · water is a polar solvent
Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity Step 2 · Find the solvent's polarity Step 3 · Match them
ionic solute · polar solvent same family, it dissolves
The new ion–water attractions are as strong as the ones inside the salt, so the crystal comes apart and dissolves.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — cooking grease in water

cooking grease rinsed with cold water
nonpolar solute · solvent: water, polar

Grease is nonpolar, and you try to rinse a greasy pan with plain cold water.

A common first answer: water dissolves so much that enough of it must wash the grease away. Test it against the method.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

cooking grease rinsed with cold water
nonpolar solute · solvent: water, polar

A common first answer

enough water washes the grease away?
water dissolves polar and ionic things — not nonpolar grease ✗

Water dissolves a lot, but only polar and ionic solutes. Adding more water changes nothing here.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

cooking grease rinsed with cold water
nonpolar solute · solvent: water, polar
A common first answer
enough water washes the grease away?
water dissolves polar and ionic things — not nonpolar grease ✗
Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity

Grease is a nonpolar mix of oils. Its molecules attract each other only weakly and carry no charge.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

cooking grease rinsed with cold water
nonpolar solute · solvent: water, polar
A common first answer
enough water washes the grease away?
water dissolves polar and ionic things — not nonpolar grease ✗
Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity Step 2 · Find the solvent's polarity

Water is polar, and holds itself together with strong hydrogen bonds.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

cooking grease rinsed with cold water
nonpolar solute · solvent: water, polar
A common first answer
enough water washes the grease away?
water dissolves polar and ionic things — not nonpolar grease ✗
Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity Step 2 · Find the solvent's polarity Step 3 · Match them
nonpolar solute · polar solvent a mismatch, it stays separate

Water's hydrogen bonds to itself are far stronger than its weak attraction to the grease, so the grease is left untouched.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

cooking grease rinsed with cold water
nonpolar solute · solvent: water, polar
A common first answer
enough water washes the grease away?
water dissolves polar and ionic things — not nonpolar grease ✗
Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity Step 2 · Find the solvent's polarity Step 3 · Match them
nonpolar solute · polar solvent a mismatch, it stays separate
The attraction between grease and water is far weaker than water's attraction to itself. The grease beads up and stays put, however much water runs over it.
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: water is not a universal solvent

salt · sugar · vinegar — dissolve in water
polar and ionic solutes: water's charged ends attract them
oil · grease · wax — do not dissolve in water
nonpolar solutes: water bonds to itself and leaves them out

Water dissolves polar and ionic solutes, not everything. A nonpolar solute cannot replace the strong hydrogen bonds between water molecules, so it stays separate however much water is present.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — candle wax in water

a chip of candle wax dropped into water
wax is nonpolar · water is a polar solvent
step question answer
1 · solute polarity polar/ionic, or nonpolar? wax is
2 · solvent polarity polar or nonpolar? water is
3 · match them same family, or a mismatch?

Fill the three cells, then read off the result.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — candle wax in water

a chip of candle wax dropped into water
wax is nonpolar · water is a polar solvent
step question answer
1 · solute polarity polar/ionic, or nonpolar? wax is
2 · solvent polarity polar or nonpolar? water is
3 · match them same family, or a mismatch?

Fill the three cells, then read off the result.

candle wax + water → stays separate
nonpolar solute · polar solvent · a mismatch — the wax needs a nonpolar solvent
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

Treating water as a universal solvent. Water dissolves many things, but only polar and ionic ones. A nonpolar solute like oil or grease is attracted to water far more weakly than water is to itself, so no amount of water dissolves it.
Arguing that opposite polarities attract. Opposite charges attract, plus to minus. Solubility does not work that way. It follows like dissolves like: a nonpolar solute needs a nonpolar solvent, never a polar one.
Expecting stirring to overcome a mismatch. Stirring and waiting change how fast a solute dissolves, never whether it dissolves. A polarity mismatch stays undissolved however long you stir.
Reading a big carbon molecule as automatically nonpolar. Sugar and glycerol are built on carbon, yet their many –OH groups are polar and hydrogen-bond with water. Count the polar groups before calling a molecule nonpolar.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

bike chain grease, a nonpolar substance
which solvent removes it best?

Bike chain grease is nonpolar, and a mechanic wants to wash it off completely. Which solvent works best, and why?

  1. Mineral spirits, a nonpolar solvent — a nonpolar solute dissolves best in a nonpolar solvent (like dissolves like)
  2. Water — it is the "universal solvent," so given enough of it, water dissolves anything
  3. Water — opposite polarities attract, so a polar solvent pulls the nonpolar grease apart best
  4. Either solvent works, as long as the mechanic scrubs long enough
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: A

bike chain grease → mineral spirits (nonpolar) — answer A
nonpolar solute · nonpolar solvent · same family, it dissolves

B calls water a universal solvent, but water dissolves only polar and ionic solutes; nonpolar grease is attracted to water far more weakly than water is to itself. C borrows "opposites attract" from charges, where it does not apply. Solubility follows like dissolves like, so the nonpolar grease needs a nonpolar solvent. D counts on scrubbing, which changes only the rate, not whether a mismatch ever dissolves.

Match the families first: nonpolar grease, nonpolar solvent. Mineral spirits lifts it; water leaves it behind.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — sugar in water

table sugar (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁) stirred into water
carbon-heavy molecule · 342.30 g/mol · solvent: water, polar

Sugar is a large molecule built on a carbon framework, which makes it look nonpolar. Predict whether it dissolves in water, and why.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — the polar groups

table sugar (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁) stirred into water
carbon-heavy molecule · 342.30 g/mol · solvent: water, polar

Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity

The carbon framework is nonpolar, but the molecule carries eight polar –OH groups.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — the polar groups

table sugar (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁) stirred into water
carbon-heavy molecule · 342.30 g/mol · solvent: water, polar

Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity

The carbon framework is nonpolar, but the molecule carries eight polar –OH groups.

The carbon count is a distraction. The eight polar –OH groups decide it: sugar is polar.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — the polar groups

table sugar (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁) stirred into water
carbon-heavy molecule · 342.30 g/mol · solvent: water, polar

Step 1 · Find the solute's polarity

The carbon framework is nonpolar, but the molecule carries eight polar –OH groups.

The carbon count is a distraction. The eight polar –OH groups decide it: sugar is polar.
Step 2 · Find the solvent's polarity

Water is polar, and every one of those –OH groups can hydrogen-bond to it.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — the match

table sugar (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁) — polar, covered in –OH groups
solvent: water, polar

Step 3 · Match them

polar solute · polar solvent same family, it dissolves
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — the match

table sugar (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁) — polar, covered in –OH groups
solvent: water, polar

Step 3 · Match them

polar solute · polar solvent same family, it dissolves
Do not judge a molecule by its carbon count. Sugar's eight polar –OH groups make it polar, so it dissolves in water. The tea turns sweet.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

vitamin D, a nonpolar molecule the body stores in fat
which kind of solvent dissolves it?

Vitamin D is nonpolar. The body keeps it in fatty tissue, not in watery blood plasma. Which kind of solvent dissolves it best, and why?

  1. A nonpolar solvent, like the fats it is stored in — a nonpolar solute dissolves best in a nonpolar solvent
  2. Water — blood plasma is mostly water, the "universal solvent," so it dissolves any vitamin
  3. Water — opposite polarities attract, so watery plasma pulls the nonpolar vitamin apart
  4. Either solvent, given enough time circulating in the body
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: A

vitamin D → a nonpolar solvent (the body's fats) — answer A
nonpolar solute · nonpolar solvent · same family, it dissolves

B leans on water as a universal solvent, but water dissolves only polar and ionic solutes; a nonpolar vitamin stays out, which is why the body stores it in fat rather than blood. C borrows "opposites attract" from charges, where solubility does not follow it. D counts on time, which changes only the rate, not whether a mismatch dissolves at all.

Fat-soluble means nonpolar, so vitamin D dissolves in the body's fats, not its watery blood.
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. Iodine (I₂) is a nonpolar solid. It barely colors water but turns hexane deep purple. Which solvent dissolves it, and why?
  2. Rubbing alcohol mixes with water in any amount. What does that tell you about its polarity?

Some solutes keep dissolving in a solvent until the solvent can hold no more. That limit, and how temperature shifts it, is the next question about solutions.

Dr. Karmach

2 · Saturation & Solubility Curves

Read a solubility curve to find how much solute dissolves at a given temperature, classify a solution as unsaturated, saturated, or supersaturated, and find how much crystallizes when it cools.

Dr. Karmach

When sugar stops dissolving

Stir spoon after spoon of sugar into iced tea. At first it disappears. Past a point it just piles at the bottom, and warm tea takes far more.

Dr. Karmach

Every solute has a limit

solubility = the maximum solute that dissolves in a fixed amount of water at a given temperature
measured in grams of solute per 100 g of water, at a stated temperature
KNO₃ at 20 °C: 32 g per 100 g water
stir in more than 32 g and the extra cannot dissolve — it stays as solid

A fixed amount of water at a fixed temperature dissolves only so much solute. That ceiling is the solute's solubility, and where a solution sits relative to it decides how it behaves.

Dr. Karmach

Unsaturated, saturated, supersaturated

Below the limit a solution is unsaturated: more dissolves. At the limit it is saturated, solid in balance with dissolved. Above the limit it is supersaturated: unstable, one crystal drops the excess out.

Dr. Karmach

Reading the solubility curve

A solubility curve plots the limit against temperature. Most solids dissolve more as water warms, so the KNO₃ curve climbs steeply while NaCl stays nearly flat. Gases do the reverse: less dissolves as water warms.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Read the curve at the temperature. Grams per 100 g of water.
  2. Scale to the water present. × (grams of water ÷ 100).
  3. Compare with the limit. Below unsaturated, at saturated, above supersaturated. Cooling drops the excess out.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — classifying a solution

100 g KNO₃ stirred into 200 g of water at 40 °C — it all dissolves
given: 100 g solute · 200 g water · 40 °C · wanted: unsaturated, saturated, or supersaturated?

A common first attempt: the curve reads 64 g at 40 °C, so 64 g is the most this beaker holds. Test it.

Classify the solution.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

100 g KNO₃ in 200 g of water at 40 °C
given: 100 g solute · 200 g water · 40 °C

A common first attempt

A first attempt uses 64 g as the limit. But 64 g is per 100 g of water, and this beaker holds 200 g. Scale it first.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

100 g KNO₃ in 200 g of water at 40 °C
given: 100 g solute · 200 g water · 40 °C
A common first attempt Step 1 · Read the curve at the temperature
at 40 °C, the KNO₃ curve = 64 g per 100 g water
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

100 g KNO₃ in 200 g of water at 40 °C
given: 100 g solute · 200 g water · 40 °C
A common first attempt Step 1 · Read the curve at the temperature
at 40 °C, the KNO₃ curve = 64 g per 100 g water
Step 2 · Scale to the water present
200 g H₂O × 64 g KNO₃100 g H₂O = 128 g KNO₃
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

100 g KNO₃ in 200 g of water at 40 °C
given: 100 g solute · 200 g water · 40 °C
A common first attempt Step 1 · Read the curve at the temperature
at 40 °C, the KNO₃ curve = 64 g per 100 g water
Step 2 · Scale to the water present
200 g H₂O × Step 3 · Compare with the limit
128 g limit − 100 g present = 28 g of room left → unsaturated
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

100 g KNO₃ in 200 g of water at 40 °C
given: 100 g solute · 200 g water · 40 °C
A common first attempt Step 1 · Read the curve at the temperature
at 40 °C, the KNO₃ curve = 64 g per 100 g water
Step 2 · Scale to the water present
200 g H₂O × Step 3 · Compare with the limit
128 g limit − 100 g present = 28 g of room left → unsaturated
The water could still take 28 g more KNO₃ before any solid appears. Below the limit means unsaturated.
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: the curve value is per 100 g of water

curve read: 64 g per 100 g water at 40 °C
a ratio — the limit for this beaker depends on how much water it holds
200 g water → 200 g × (64 g / 100 g) = 128 g
scale before comparing: the beaker's limit is 128 g, not 64 g

Solubility is grams per 100 g of water. Multiply by the water actually present before judging saturation. Skipping the scale answers a different beaker.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — cooling a saturated solution

100 g of water holds all the KNO₃ it can at 60 °C, then cools to 20 °C
given: 100 g water · saturated at 60 °C · cooled to 20 °C · wanted: grams that crystallize

A hot solution saturated with KNO₃ is left to cool on the bench.

How many grams of KNO₃ fall out as crystals?

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

saturated KNO₃ in 100 g water · 60 °C → 20 °C
given: 100 g water · saturated at 60 °C · cooled to 20 °C

Step 1 · Read the curve at the temperature

at 60 °C = 106 g / 100 g water · at 20 °C = 32 g / 100 g water
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

saturated KNO₃ in 100 g water · 60 °C → 20 °C
given: 100 g water · saturated at 60 °C · cooled to 20 °C
Step 1 · Read the curve at the temperature
at 60 °C = 106 g / 100 g water · at 20 °C = 32 g / 100 g water
Step 2 · Scale to the water present

The beaker holds 100 g of water, so the per-100-g values apply directly: 106 g dissolved at 60 °C, 32 g the limit at 20 °C.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

saturated KNO₃ in 100 g water · 60 °C → 20 °C
given: 100 g water · saturated at 60 °C · cooled to 20 °C
Step 1 · Read the curve at the temperature
at 60 °C = 106 g / 100 g water · at 20 °C = 32 g / 100 g water
Step 2 · Scale to the water present Step 3 · Compare with the limit
106 g dissolved − 32 g the cool water can hold = 74 g crystallize

At 60 °C all 106 g were dissolved. At 20 °C only 32 g can stay. The rest leaves solution as solid.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

saturated KNO₃ in 100 g water · 60 °C → 20 °C
given: 100 g water · saturated at 60 °C · cooled to 20 °C
Step 1 · Read the curve at the temperature
at 60 °C = 106 g / 100 g water · at 20 °C = 32 g / 100 g water
Step 2 · Scale to the water present Step 3 · Compare with the limit
106 g dissolved − 32 g the cool water can hold = 74 g crystallize
Cooling lowers the limit, and the 74 g it can no longer hold drops out as crystals. Less dissolves cold than hot.
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — cooling from 50 °C to 30 °C

saturated KNO₃ in 100 g of water at 50 °C, cooled to 30 °C
curve: 50 °C reads 85 g / 100 g water · 30 °C reads 46 g / 100 g water
85 g dissolved − 46 g the cool water can hold = g crystallize

Read both limits, then subtract to find what falls out.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — cooling from 50 °C to 30 °C

saturated KNO₃ in 100 g of water at 50 °C, cooled to 30 °C
curve: 50 °C reads 85 g / 100 g water · 30 °C reads 46 g / 100 g water
85 g dissolved − 46 g the cool water can hold = g crystallize

Read both limits, then subtract to find what falls out.

85 g dissolved − 46 g the cool water can hold = 39 g crystallize

Cooling from 50 °C to 30 °C drops 39 g of KNO₃ out of solution.

Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

Stirring past the limit. Add 90 g of a salt whose limit is 60 g, then stir for an hour: 60 g dissolves and 90 − 60 = 30 g stays on the bottom. Stirring speeds dissolving up to the limit; it cannot push past it.
Using the curve value without scaling. The curve gives grams per 100 g of water. For 150 g of water at 60 °C the beaker holds 150 × (106 g / 100 g) = 159 g, not 106 g. Scale to the water present first.
Adding instead of subtracting on cooling. A solution with 106 g dissolved, cooled to a 32 g limit, does not shed 106 + 32 = 138 g. What crystallizes is the excess: 106 − 32 = 74 g.
Reading at the wrong temperature. Cooling to 20 °C means reading the limit at 20 °C, not at 40 °C. The 40 °C value gives 106 − 64 = 42 g and understates the crystals. Read straight up from the final temperature.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

NaCl solubility at 20 °C: 36 g per 100 g of water
75 g of NaCl stirred into 50 g of water at 20 °C, stirred thoroughly

How many grams of NaCl remain undissolved at the bottom?

  1. 0 g — thorough stirring drives all of it into solution
  2. 18 g — the amount of NaCl the 50 g of water can dissolve
  3. 39 g — 75 g added minus the 36 g listed on the curve
  4. 57 g — 75 g added minus the amount that dissolves
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: D

NaCl at 20 °C: 36 g per 100 g water · 75 g into 50 g water
scale the limit to 50 g of water, then subtract
50 g H₂O × 36 g NaCl100 g H₂O = 18 g dissolve
75 g added − 18 g dissolved = 57 g undissolved — answer D

A: 0 g assumes stirring dissolves everything; past the limit the extra stays solid. B: 18 g is how much dissolves, not what is left: 75 − 18 = 57. C: 39 g used 36 g as the limit for this beaker, but 36 g is per 100 g of water — only 50 g is here, so 50 × 36/100 = 18 g dissolves.

More salt was added than 50 g of water can hold, so solid must remain. The 18 g that dissolves leaves 57 g on the bottom. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

KNO₃ curve: 106 g / 100 g water at 60 °C · 32 g / 100 g water at 20 °C
a solution saturated with KNO₃ in 150 g of water at 60 °C is cooled to 20 °C

How many grams of KNO₃ crystallize?

  1. 48 g — the amount that stays dissolved once the solution reaches 20 °C
  2. 74 g — 106 g minus 32 g, straight from the curve
  3. 111 g — what 150 g of water holds at 60 °C minus what it holds at 20 °C
  4. 207 g — the 60 °C amount plus the 20 °C amount
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: C

saturated KNO₃ in 150 g water · 60 °C → 20 °C
scale each limit to 150 g of water, then subtract
150 g H₂O × 106 g KNO₃100 g H₂O = 159 g dissolved at 60 °C
159 g dissolved − 48 g the 20 °C water holds = 111 g crystallize — answer C

A: 48 g (= 150 × 32/100) is what stays dissolved at 20 °C, not what fell out. B: 74 g forgot to scale — 106 − 32 is per 100 g of water, but 150 g is present. D: 207 g added the two amounts, 159 + 48, instead of subtracting.

Scaling to 150 g of water raises every amount by half again. What the cooler water can no longer hold, 111 g, crystallizes. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A solution holds 30 g of KNO₃ in 100 g of water at 60 °C, where the limit is 106 g. Unsaturated, saturated, or supersaturated?
  2. A solution saturated with KNO₃ at 40 °C (limit 64 g) in 100 g of water is cooled to 20 °C (limit 32 g). How many grams crystallize?

A dissolved solute raises the next question: how much of it is in the water — the concentration. Adding water lowers the concentration without changing the amount of solute, the relation M₁V₁ = M₂V₂.

Dr. Karmach

3 · Dilution

Use M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ to find a diluted concentration or the stock volume needed for a target, remembering that adding water conserves the moles of solute and that both volumes must share a unit.

Dr. Karmach

One can makes a whole pitcher

Frozen juice concentrate is thick and strong. Stir one small can into a pitcher of water and it becomes a full, mild drink. Same juice, just more liquid.

Dr. Karmach

The solute stays; only the water grows

Adding water spreads the solute through more liquid. Not one particle of solute is added or removed, so the moles of solute stay fixed. That conservation is the whole rule: M₁V₁ = M₂V₂.

Dr. Karmach

The four quantities in M₁V₁ = M₂V₂

Before diluting: concentration M₁ and volume V₁. After: concentration M₂ and volume V₂. Their products are equal because the moles of solute, concentration times volume, never change.

Dr. Karmach

Both volumes in the same unit

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
V₁ and V₂ both in mL, or both in L · the volume unit cancels across the equation

The relation balances only when V₁ and V₂ carry the same volume unit. Put both in milliliters or both in liters. The solved volume comes out in whatever unit you used.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. List the knowns: three of M₁, V₁, M₂, V₂; mark the unknown.
  2. Rearrange for the unknown in M₁V₁ = M₂V₂.
  3. Match the volume units: both mL, or both L.
  4. Substitute and solve; the diluted concentration comes out lower.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — concentration after dilution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 25.0 mL stock · water to 150. mL final · wanted: M₂

A stockroom takes 25.0 mL of 6.00 M HCl and adds water to a final volume of 150. mL. Find the concentration of the diluted solution.

List the knowns, then rearrange M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ for M₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 25.0 mL stock · water to 150. mL final · wanted: M₂

Step 1 · List the knowns

M₁ = 6.00 M. V₁ = 25.0 mL. V₂ = 150. mL. The unknown is M₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 25.0 mL stock · water to 150. mL final · wanted: M₂
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown
M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ M₂ = M₁ × V₁V₂
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 25.0 mL stock · water to 150. mL final · wanted: M₂
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown
M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ M₂ = M₁ × V₁V₂
Step 3 · Match the volume units Step 4 · Substitute and solve

Both volumes are in mL, so the volume ratio cancels to a pure number.

M₂ = 6.00 M × 25.0 mL150. mL = 1.00 M
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 25.0 mL stock · water to 150. mL final · wanted: M₂
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown
M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ M₂ = M₁ × V₁V₂
Step 3 · Match the volume units Step 4 · Substitute and solve
M₂ = 6.00 M × 25.0 mL150. mL = 1.00 M
The volume grew six-fold, from 25.0 to 150. mL, so the concentration falls six-fold: 6.00 ÷ 6 = 1.00 M. Diluting lowers the concentration ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — final volume after dilution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 30.0 mL stock · dilute to 0.500 M · wanted: V₂

How much dilute solution results when 30.0 mL of 6.00 M NaOH is diluted with water to 0.500 M? Find the total volume.

A tempting setup puts the lower concentration on top. Weigh it against the sense check.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 30.0 mL stock · dilute to 0.500 M · wanted: V₂

A common first attempt

V₂ = 30.0 mL × 0.500 M6.00 M = 2.50 mL ✗

A dilution that ends with less liquid than it started. The concentration ratio is upside down.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 30.0 mL stock · dilute to 0.500 M · wanted: V₂
A common first attempt
V₂ = 30.0 mL × 0.500 M6.00 M = 2.50 mL ✗
Step 1 · List the knowns

M₁ = 6.00 M. V₁ = 30.0 mL. M₂ = 0.500 M. The unknown is V₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 30.0 mL stock · dilute to 0.500 M · wanted: V₂
A common first attempt
V₂ = 30.0 mL × 0.500 M6.00 M = 2.50 mL ✗
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown

Solve M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ for V₂: it equals V₁ scaled by the concentration ratio M₁ ÷ M₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 30.0 mL stock · dilute to 0.500 M · wanted: V₂
A common first attempt
V₂ = 30.0 mL × 0.500 M6.00 M = 2.50 mL ✗
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown Step 3 · Match the volume units Step 4 · Substitute and solve

V₁ is in mL, so V₂ comes out in mL. The starting concentration sits on top:

V₂ = 30.0 mL × 6.00 M0.500 M = 360 mL
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 6.00 M · 30.0 mL stock · dilute to 0.500 M · wanted: V₂
A common first attempt
V₂ = 30.0 mL × 0.500 M6.00 M = 2.50 mL ✗
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown Step 3 · Match the volume units Step 4 · Substitute and solve
V₂ = 30.0 mL × 6.00 M0.500 M = 360 mL
6.00 M down to 0.500 M is a twelve-fold drop, so the volume grows: 30.0 mL × 12 = 360 mL ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: diluting grows the volume

V₂ = 30.0 mL × 0.500 M6.00 M = 2.50 mL ✗ — smaller than the start
V₂ = 30.0 mL × 6.00 M0.500 M = 360 mL ✓

Diluting spreads the solute through more liquid, so the final volume exceeds the start. Keep the higher starting concentration on top, and the volume grows. A shrinking result means the ratio was flipped.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — glucose from a stock

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: stock 1.50 M glucose · dilute to 0.300 M · final volume 250. mL · wanted: V₁

A recipe needs 250. mL of 0.300 M glucose, poured from a 1.50 M glucose stock. What volume of the stock delivers it?

V₁ = V₂ × M₂M₁ = mL × M M = mL

Fill the final volume, then the two concentrations, and compute the stock volume.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — glucose from a stock

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: stock 1.50 M glucose · dilute to 0.300 M · final volume 250. mL · wanted: V₁
V₁ = V₂ × M₂M₁ = mL × M M = mL
V₁ = V₂ × M₂M₁ = 250. mL × 0.300 M1.50 M = 50.0 mL
The stock is five times stronger, 1.50 M against 0.300 M, so it takes a fifth of the final volume: 250. ÷ 5 = 50.0 mL ✓
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

6.00 M · 30.0 mL stock · dilute to 0.500 M
correct: V₂ = 30.0 mL × (6.00 M ÷ 0.500 M) = 360 mL
Flipping the concentration ratio. 30.0 mL × (0.500 M ÷ 6.00 M) = 2.50 mL claims diluting shrank the liquid. The higher starting concentration goes on top: 30.0 × (6.00 ÷ 0.500) = 360 mL.
Stopping at the solute amount. 30.0 mL × 6.00 M = 180 gives the millimoles of solute, not a volume. Divide that by the new concentration: 180 ÷ 0.500 = 360 mL.
Reporting only the water added. 360 − 30.0 = 330 mL is the water poured in. The total volume still holds the original 30.0 mL of stock: 360 mL.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
start 5.00 M HNO₃ · dilute to 0.400 M

You have 40.0 mL of 5.00 M nitric acid (HNO₃) and dilute it with water until the concentration is 0.400 M. What is the total volume of the dilute solution?

  1. 3.20 mL
  2. 500. mL
  3. 460. mL
  4. 200. mL
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: B

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 5.00 M · 40.0 mL HNO₃ · dilute to 0.400 M · wanted: V₂
V₂ = 40.0 mL × 5.00 M0.400 M = 500. mL — answer B

A flipped the ratio: 40.0 × (0.400 ÷ 5.00) = 3.20 mL, a volume smaller than the start. C reported only the water added: 500. − 40.0 = 460. mL, dropping the original 40.0 mL. D stopped at the solute amount: 40.0 × 5.00 = 200 millimoles, not a volume.

5.00 M down to 0.400 M is a 12.5-fold drop, so 40.0 mL grows to 40.0 × 12.5 = 500. mL ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — stock volume for a target

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: dilute to 0.150 M · final volume 2.00 L · stock 6.00 M · wanted: mL of stock

A titration needs 2.00 L of 0.150 M HCl. The stockroom stocks 6.00 M HCl. What volume of the stock, in milliliters, do you measure out?

Track the unit on every volume as you go.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: dilute to 0.150 M · final volume 2.00 L · stock 6.00 M · wanted: mL of stock

A common first attempt

V₁ = 2.00 L × 0.150 M6.00 M = 0.0500 mL ✗

A droplet cannot dilute to fill 2.00 L. The result came out in liters, because the volume entered in liters.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: dilute to 0.150 M · final volume 2.00 L · stock 6.00 M · wanted: mL of stock
A common first attempt
V₁ = 2.00 L × 0.150 M6.00 M = 0.0500 mL ✗
Step 1 · List the knowns

M₂ = 0.150 M. V₂ = 2.00 L. M₁ = 6.00 M. The unknown is V₁, wanted in mL.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: dilute to 0.150 M · final volume 2.00 L · stock 6.00 M · wanted: mL of stock
A common first attempt
V₁ = 2.00 L × 0.150 M6.00 M = 0.0500 mL ✗
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown

Solve M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ for V₁: it equals V₂ scaled by the concentration ratio M₂ ÷ M₁.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: dilute to 0.150 M · final volume 2.00 L · stock 6.00 M · wanted: mL of stock
A common first attempt
V₁ = 2.00 L × 0.150 M6.00 M = 0.0500 mL ✗
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown Step 3 · Match the volume units Step 4 · Substitute and solve

V₂ entered in liters, so V₁ lands in liters. Convert to milliliters at the end:

V₁ = 2.00 L × 0.150 M6.00 M = 0.0500 L = 50.0 mL
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: dilute to 0.150 M · final volume 2.00 L · stock 6.00 M · wanted: mL of stock
A common first attempt
V₁ = 2.00 L × 0.150 M6.00 M = 0.0500 mL ✗
Step 1 · List the knowns Step 2 · Rearrange for the unknown Step 3 · Match the volume units Step 4 · Substitute and solve
V₁ = 2.00 L × 0.150 M6.00 M = 0.0500 L = 50.0 mL
The stock is forty times stronger than 0.150 M, so V₁ is a fortieth of 2.00 L: 0.0500 L, 50.0 mL ✓
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
start 2.00 M KOH · dilute to 0.250 M

A greenhouse dilutes 25.0 mL of 2.00 M potassium hydroxide (KOH) with water until it reads 0.250 M. What total volume of dilute solution results?

  1. 3.13 mL
  2. 50.0 mL
  3. 200. mL
  4. 175. mL
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: C

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂
given: 2.00 M · 25.0 mL KOH · dilute to 0.250 M · wanted: V₂
V₂ = 25.0 mL × 2.00 M0.250 M = 200. mL — answer C

A flipped the ratio: 25.0 × (0.250 ÷ 2.00) = 3.13 mL, smaller than the start. B stopped at the solute amount: 25.0 × 2.00 = 50.0 millimoles, not a volume. D reported only the water added: 200. − 25.0 = 175. mL, dropping the original 25.0 mL.

2.00 M down to 0.250 M is an eight-fold drop, so 25.0 mL grows to 25.0 × 8 = 200. mL ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A bottle reads 6.00 M NaOH. Write M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ for making 250. mL of 0.300 M NaOH, with the three known values filled in. Which volume is larger: the stock you measure, or 250. mL?
  2. You dilute a stock and your result for the final volume comes out smaller than the volume you started with. Name the error, and state which concentration belongs on top of the ratio.

Molarity reports solute per liter of solution. The same amount can be reported per kilogram of solvent (molality), or as a percent by mass or by volume. Diluting still conserves the solute; only the per-amount unit changes.

Dr. Karmach

4 · Molality & Mole Fraction

Calculate the molality of a solution from grams of solute and grams of solvent, find the mole fraction of each component, and explain why these measures do not change with temperature.

Dr. Karmach

Coolant that warms and swells

Antifreeze in a cold engine sits at a low line. Running hot, the same liquid expands and rises. Its blend never changed — only the space it fills.

Dr. Karmach

Measured by amount and mass, not volume

Molarity divides by the solution's volume, and volume swells when warmed. Molality and mole fraction count moles and weigh mass instead of measuring volume, so temperature does not change them.

Dr. Karmach

Molality: moles of solute per kilogram of solvent

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
a 2.0 m solution — every kilogram of the SOLVENT carries 2.0 mol solute · read "two molal"

Molality, symbol m, counts the moles of solute in each kilogram of solvent. The denominator is the solvent alone — not the solution, and not a volume.

Dr. Karmach

Temperature changes volume, not mass

warm a solution: volume 1.00 L → 1.03 L · molarity falls
the moles are unchanged, but they now spread through more liters
warm the same solution: solvent mass 1.00 kg → 1.00 kg · molality holds
mass does not expand, so moles per kilogram stay put

Heat expands a liquid's volume but never its mass. Molarity changes with temperature; molality and mole fraction do not.

Dr. Karmach

Mole fraction: a component's share of the moles

The mole fraction X of a component is its moles divided by the total moles. It carries no units, and the fractions of all components add to 1.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Grams → moles: convert the solute's mass with its molar mass.
  2. Grams → kilograms: divide the solvent's mass by 1000.
  3. Divide moles by kilograms: the quotient is the molality, in mol/kg.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — molality from grams

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 18.0 g glucose (C₆H₁₂O₆, 180.16 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m

A syrup is made by dissolving 18.0 g of glucose (C₆H₁₂O₆, 180.16 g/mol) in 250. g of water. Find the molality.

Set it up: turn the solute into moles and the solvent into kilograms, then divide.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 18.0 g glucose (180.16 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m

Step 1 · Grams → moles

The molar mass converts the solute's mass to moles: 18.0 g ÷ 180.16 g/mol = 0.0999 mol glucose.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 18.0 g glucose (180.16 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m
Step 1 · Grams → moles Step 2 · Grams → kilograms
250. g water = 0.250 kg water
1000 g = 1 kg · molality counts kilograms of the solvent
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 18.0 g glucose (180.16 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m
Step 1 · Grams → moles Step 2 · Grams → kilograms
250. g water = 0.250 kg water
1000 g = 1 kg · molality counts kilograms of the solvent
Step 3 · Divide moles by kilograms
m = 0.0999 mol glucose0.250 kg water = 0.400 mol/kg
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 18.0 g glucose (180.16 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m
Step 1 · Grams → moles Step 2 · Grams → kilograms
250. g water = 0.250 kg water
1000 g = 1 kg · molality counts kilograms of the solvent
Step 3 · Divide moles by kilograms
m = 0.0999 mol glucose0.250 kg water = 0.400 mol/kg
A quarter kilogram of water carries 0.0999 mol, so a full kilogram carries four times that: 0.400 mol. 0.400 m ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — mole fraction in antifreeze

X = mol of one component ÷ total mol
given: 62.0 g ethylene glycol (C₂H₆O₂, 62.07 g/mol) · 180. g water (18.02 g/mol) · wanted: X of each

An antifreeze mix contains 62.0 g of ethylene glycol (62.07 g/mol) and 180. g of water (18.02 g/mol). Find the mole fraction of each component.

Set it up: both masses become moles before any fraction is taken.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

X = mol of one component ÷ total mol
given: 62.0 g ethylene glycol (62.07 g/mol) · 180. g water (18.02 g/mol) · wanted: X of each

Grams → moles, each component

Ethylene glycol: 62.0 g ÷ 62.07 g/mol = 0.999 mol. Water: 180. g ÷ 18.02 g/mol = 9.99 mol.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

X = mol of one component ÷ total mol
given: 62.0 g ethylene glycol (62.07 g/mol) · 180. g water (18.02 g/mol) · wanted: X of each
Grams → moles, each component Divide each by the total moles
Xglycol = 0.999 mol(0.999 + 9.99) mol = 0.0909
Xwater = 9.99 mol10.99 mol = 0.909
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

X = mol of one component ÷ total mol
given: 62.0 g ethylene glycol (62.07 g/mol) · 180. g water (18.02 g/mol) · wanted: X of each
Grams → moles, each component Divide each by the total moles
Xglycol = 0.999 mol(0.999 + 9.99) mol = 0.0909
Xwater = 9.99 mol10.99 mol = 0.909
The two fractions add to 1.000, and water, the greater amount, takes the larger share. 0.0909 + 0.909 = 1.000 ✓
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — sucrose in water

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 34.2 g sucrose (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁, 342.30 g/mol) · 500. g water · wanted: m

A sweetened solution holds 34.2 g of sucrose (342.30 g/mol) in 500. g of water.

34.2 g sucrose × 1 mol sucrose g sucrose = mol, then mol sucrose kg water = mol/kg

Fill the molar mass, the moles, and the kilograms of solvent, then compute the molality.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — sucrose in water

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 34.2 g sucrose (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁, 342.30 g/mol) · 500. g water · wanted: m

A sweetened solution holds 34.2 g of sucrose (342.30 g/mol) in 500. g of water.

34.2 g sucrose × 1 mol sucrose g sucrose = mol, then mol sucrose kg water = mol/kg

Fill the molar mass, the moles, and the kilograms of solvent, then compute the molality.

34.2 g sucrose × 1 mol sucrose342.30 g sucrose = 0.0999 mol, then 0.0999 mol sucrose0.500 kg water = 0.200 mol/kg
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

18.0 g glucose (180.16 g/mol) · 250. g water
correct: 18.0 g → 0.0999 mol · 250. g → 0.250 kg · m = 0.400 mol/kg
Dividing by grams of solvent. 0.0999 mol ÷ 250 g = 0.000400, and the unit is mol/g, 1000 times too small. Molality divides by kilograms: 0.0999 ÷ 0.250 = 0.400 mol/kg.
Using the mass of the solution. The whole solution is 250 + 18.0 = 268 g, or 0.268 kg, giving 0.0999 ÷ 0.268 = 0.373. Molality uses the solvent alone: 0.250 kg.
Skipping the molar mass. 18.0 g ÷ 0.250 kg = 72.0 treats grams as moles. Grams become moles first: 18.0 ÷ 180.16 = 0.0999 mol.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
molar mass KCl 74.55 g/mol

30.0 g of KCl (74.55 g/mol) is dissolved in 300. g of water. What is the molality of the solution?

  1. 0.00134 mol/kg
  2. 1.22 mol/kg
  3. 1.34 mol/kg
  4. 100 mol/kg
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: C

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 30.0 g KCl (74.55 g/mol) · 300. g water · wanted: m
30.0 g KCl × 1 mol KCl74.55 g KCl = 0.402 mol, then 0.402 mol KCl0.300 kg water = 1.34 mol/kg — answer C

A divided by grams of solvent: 0.402 ÷ 300 = 0.00134, in mol/g. B used the solution mass: 0.402 ÷ 0.330 kg = 1.22. D skipped the molar mass: 30.0 ÷ 0.300 = 100. Grams become moles first.

0.402 mol sits in 0.300 kg of water, a bit more than one mole per kilogram: 1.34 m ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — molality of a urea solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 45.0 g urea (CH₄N₂O, 60.06 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m

A 45.0 g sample of urea (60.06 g/mol) is dissolved in 250. g of water. Find the molality.

A common first attempt: divide the moles by 250. Test the units.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 45.0 g urea (60.06 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m

A common first attempt

m = 0.749 mol urea250 g water = 0.00300 mol/g ✗

The unit came out mol/g. Molality is mol/kg — the solvent must enter in kilograms.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 45.0 g urea (60.06 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m
A common first attempt
m = 0.749 mol urea250 g water = 0.00300 mol/g ✗
Step 1 · Grams → moles

The molar mass gives the moles: 45.0 g ÷ 60.06 g/mol = 0.749 mol urea.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 45.0 g urea (60.06 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m
A common first attempt
m = 0.749 mol urea250 g water = 0.00300 mol/g ✗
Step 1 · Grams → moles Step 2 · Grams → kilograms Step 3 · Divide moles by kilograms

The 250. g of water is 0.250 kg. Divide:

45.0 g urea × 1 mol urea60.06 g urea = 0.749 mol, then 0.749 mol urea0.250 kg water = 3.00 mol/kg
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 45.0 g urea (60.06 g/mol) · 250. g water · wanted: m
A common first attempt
m = 0.749 mol urea250 g water = 0.00300 mol/g ✗
Step 1 · Grams → moles Step 2 · Grams → kilograms Step 3 · Divide moles by kilograms
45.0 g urea × 1 mol urea60.06 g urea = 0.749 mol, then 0.749 mol urea0.250 kg water = 3.00 mol/kg
A quarter kilogram carries 0.749 mol, so a full kilogram carries four times that: 3.00 mol. 3.00 m ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: divide by kilograms of solvent

m = 0.749 mol250 g = 0.00300 mol/g ✗ — not a molality
m = 0.749 mol0.250 kg = 3.00 mol/kg ✓

Molality is defined per kilogram of solvent. A solvent mass left in grams gives a result 1000 times too small. Convert grams to kilograms, and use the solvent, never the solution.

Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
molar mass ethylene glycol 62.07 g/mol

40.0 g of ethylene glycol (62.07 g/mol) is dissolved in 500. g of water. What is the molality of the solution?

  1. 0.00129 mol/kg
  2. 1.29 mol/kg
  3. 1.19 mol/kg
  4. 80.0 mol/kg
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: B

m = mol solute ÷ kg solvent
given: 40.0 g ethylene glycol (62.07 g/mol) · 500. g water · wanted: m
40.0 g glycol × 1 mol glycol62.07 g glycol = 0.644 mol, then 0.644 mol glycol0.500 kg water = 1.29 mol/kg — answer B

A divided by grams of solvent: 0.644 ÷ 500 = 0.00129, in mol/g. C used the solution mass: 0.644 ÷ 0.540 kg = 1.19. D skipped the molar mass: 40.0 ÷ 0.500 = 80.0. Convert grams to moles, then divide by kilograms of solvent.

0.644 mol in half a kilogram of water is about 1.3 mol per kilogram: 1.29 m ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A solution is prepared from grams of solute and grams of water. Which mass belongs in the denominator of molality — the solvent's or the whole solution's — and in what unit?
  2. A two-component mixture has X = 0.30 for one component. What is the mole fraction of the other?

Molarity counts moles per liter of solution; molality counts moles per kilogram of solvent. Given the solution's density, either concentration can be converted into the other.

Dr. Karmach

5 · Converting Concentration Units

Convert a solution's concentration among mass percent, molarity, and molality by taking a convenient basis and bridging with density and molar mass.

Dr. Karmach

The label reads 37%. The lab wants moles.

A jug of hydrochloric acid is labeled 37% by mass. The experiment needs it in moles per liter. The density on the label connects the two.

Dr. Karmach

One solution, three descriptions

The same bottle can be reported three ways: mass percent, molality, or molarity. Each counts the solute against a different amount. Molar mass and density are the conversion factors that carry one description into another.

Dr. Karmach

Density and molar mass convert the units

1 mL of solution = (density) grams · 1 mol of solute = (molar mass) grams
density crosses volume ↔ mass · molar mass crosses mass ↔ moles

Mass percent and molality describe the solute per unit mass; molarity describes it per unit volume. Density carries a mass to a volume; molar mass carries a mass to a mole count.

Dr. Karmach

Pick a convenient basis

Concentration is a rate — the same for a drop or a drum. Take whatever amount makes the numbers easy: 1 L for molarity, 100 g for mass percent or molality. The ratio is the same.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Pick a basis: take 1 L of solution.
  2. Density → mass of solution: 1000 mL times the density.
  3. Mass percent → mass of solute: its share of that mass.
  4. Molar mass → moles: then divide by the 1 L.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — mass percent to molarity

37.0% (m/m) HCl · density 1.19 g/mL · molar mass 36.46 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution

Concentrated hydrochloric acid is 37.0% by mass, with a density of 1.19 g/mL. What is its molarity?

Take 1 L, then convert with the density and the molar mass.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

37.0% (m/m) HCl · density 1.19 g/mL · molar mass 36.46 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution

Three conversion factors carry 1 L of solution to moles of HCl.

Step 1 · Pick a basis

Take exactly 1 L — that is 1000 mL — of the solution.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

37.0% (m/m) HCl · density 1.19 g/mL · molar mass 36.46 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution
Step 1 · Pick a basis Step 2 · Density → mass of solution

The density weighs that liter: 1000 mL × 1.19 g/mL = 1190 g of solution.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

37.0% (m/m) HCl · density 1.19 g/mL · molar mass 36.46 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution
Step 1 · Pick a basis Step 2 · Density → mass of solution Step 3 · Mass percent → mass of solute

The label makes 37.0% of that mass HCl: 0.370 × 1190 g = 440.3 g HCl.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

37.0% (m/m) HCl · density 1.19 g/mL · molar mass 36.46 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution
Step 1 · Pick a basis Step 2 · Density → mass of solution Step 3 · Mass percent → mass of solute Step 4 · Molar mass → moles
1000 mL soln × 1.19 g soln1 mL soln × 37.0 g HCl100 g soln × 1 mol HCl36.46 g HCl = 12.1 mol HCl
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

37.0% (m/m) HCl · density 1.19 g/mL · molar mass 36.46 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution
Step 1 · Pick a basis Step 2 · Density → mass of solution Step 3 · Mass percent → mass of solute Step 4 · Molar mass → moles
1000 mL soln × 1.19 g soln1 mL soln × 37.0 g HCl100 g soln × 1 mol HCl36.46 g HCl = 12.1 mol HCl
The 12.1 mol dissolve in the 1 L we chose: 12.1 M. Water alone would weigh that liter 1000 g; this acid brings it to 1190 g, and over a third of it is HCl. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — concentrated sulfuric acid

98.0% (m/m) H₂SO₄ · density 1.84 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution

Concentrated sulfuric acid is 98.0% by mass, with a density of 1.84 g/mL. What is its molarity?

A common first attempt reads 1 L as 1000 g of solution. Test that against the density.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

98.0% (m/m) H₂SO₄ · density 1.84 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution

Step 1 · Pick a basis

Take 1 L — 1000 mL — of the concentrated acid.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

98.0% (m/m) H₂SO₄ · density 1.84 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution
Step 1 · Pick a basis A common first attempt
1000 g soln × 98.0 g H₂SO₄100 g soln × 1 mol H₂SO₄98.08 g H₂SO₄ = 9.99 M ✗

That treated 1 L as 1000 g. This acid is far denser than water.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

98.0% (m/m) H₂SO₄ · density 1.84 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution
Step 1 · Pick a basis A common first attempt
1000 g soln × 98.0 g H₂SO₄100 g soln × 1 mol H₂SO₄98.08 g H₂SO₄ = 9.99 M ✗
Step 2 · Density → mass of solution

At 1.84 g/mL the liter weighs 1000 mL × 1.84 = 1840 g, not 1000 g.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

98.0% (m/m) H₂SO₄ · density 1.84 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution
Step 1 · Pick a basis A common first attempt
1000 g soln × 98.0 g H₂SO₄100 g soln × 1 mol H₂SO₄98.08 g H₂SO₄ = 9.99 M ✗
Step 2 · Density → mass of solution Step 3 · Mass percent → mass of solute Step 4 · Molar mass → moles
1000 mL soln × 1.84 g soln1 mL soln × 98.0 g H₂SO₄100 g soln × 1 mol H₂SO₄98.08 g H₂SO₄ = 18.4 mol H₂SO₄
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

98.0% (m/m) H₂SO₄ · density 1.84 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: the label · wanted: molarity · basis: take 1 L of solution
Step 1 · Pick a basis A common first attempt
1000 g soln × 98.0 g H₂SO₄100 g soln × 1 mol H₂SO₄98.08 g H₂SO₄ = 9.99 M ✗
Step 2 · Density → mass of solution Step 3 · Mass percent → mass of solute Step 4 · Molar mass → moles
1000 mL soln × 1.84 g soln1 mL soln × 98.0 g H₂SO₄100 g soln × 1 mol H₂SO₄98.08 g H₂SO₄ = 18.4 mol H₂SO₄
The 18.4 mol fill the 1 L we took: 18.4 M. Skipping the density gave 9.99 M — nearly half, because a liter of this acid weighs 1840 g, not 1000. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: weigh the liter with the density

1000 g soln × 98.0 g H₂SO₄100 g soln × 1 mol98.08 g H₂SO₄ = 9.99 M ✗ — 1 L read as 1000 g
1000 mL soln × 1.84 g soln1 mL soln × 98.0 g H₂SO₄100 g soln × 1 mol98.08 g H₂SO₄ = 18.4 M ✓

The density sets the mass of a liter of solution. Skip it and every molarity comes out too low. Weigh the liter first, then take the solute's share.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — nitric acid

30.0% (m/m) HNO₃ · density 1.18 g/mL · molar mass 63.01 g/mol
basis: take 1 L of solution · wanted: molarity

A cleaning-grade nitric acid is 30.0% by mass, density 1.18 g/mL.

1000 mL soln × g soln1 mL soln × 30.0 g HNO₃100 g soln × 1 mol HNO₃ g HNO₃ = M

Fill the density, the molar mass, and the molarity, then compute.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — nitric acid

30.0% (m/m) HNO₃ · density 1.18 g/mL · molar mass 63.01 g/mol
basis: take 1 L of solution · wanted: molarity

A cleaning-grade nitric acid is 30.0% by mass, density 1.18 g/mL.

1000 mL soln × g soln1 mL soln × 30.0 g HNO₃100 g soln × 1 mol HNO₃ g HNO₃ = M

Fill the density, the molar mass, and the molarity, then compute.

1000 mL soln × 1.18 g soln1 mL soln × 30.0 g HNO₃100 g soln × 1 mol HNO₃63.01 g HNO₃ = 5.62 M
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

37.0% (m/m) HCl · density 1.19 g/mL · molar mass 36.46 g/mol
correct: 1 L → 1190 g → 440.3 g HCl → 12.1 mol → 12.1 M
Skipping the density. Reading 1 L as 1000 g: 0.370 × 1000 ÷ 36.46 = 10.1 M. But a liter of this acid weighs 1000 × 1.19 = 1190 g, not 1000. With the density: 12.1 M.
Dividing by the density. 0.370 × 1000 ÷ 1.19 ÷ 36.46 = 8.53 M. Mass is volume × density, so the milliliters multiply by 1.19. Multiplying gives 1190 g and 12.1 M.
Dropping the 1000 mL in a liter. 0.370 × 1.19 ÷ 36.46 = 0.0121 — a thousand times too small. A liter is 1000 mL, so 1 L weighs 1190 g and the molarity is 12.1 M.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

15.0% (m/m) NaOH · density 1.16 g/mL · molar mass 40.00 g/mol
basis: take 1 L of solution · wanted: molarity

A stock 15.0% (m/m) sodium hydroxide solution has a density of 1.16 g/mL. What is its molarity?

  1. 3.75 M
  2. 3.23 M
  3. 4.35 M
  4. 0.00435 M
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: C

15.0% (m/m) NaOH · density 1.16 g/mL · molar mass 40.00 g/mol
basis: take 1 L → 1160 g solution · wanted: molarity
1000 mL soln × 1.16 g soln1 mL soln × 15.0 g NaOH100 g soln × 1 mol NaOH40.00 g NaOH = 4.35 M — answer C

A skipped the density: 0.150 × 1000 ÷ 40.00 = 3.75, reading 1 L as 1000 g instead of 1160 g. B divided by the density: 0.150 × 1000 ÷ 1.16 ÷ 40.00 = 3.23. D dropped the 1000 mL: 0.150 × 1.16 ÷ 40.00 = 0.00435, a thousand times too small.

A liter weighs 1160 g, 174 g of it NaOH, and 174 g ÷ 40.00 g/mol = 4.35 mol: 4.35 M. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — molarity back to mass percent

Step 1 · Pick a basis

4.50 M H₂SO₄ · density 1.25 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: molarity and density · wanted: mass percent · basis: take 1 L of solution

Battery acid is 4.50 M sulfuric acid with a density of 1.25 g/mL. What is its mass percent?

Run the same two factors in reverse: molar mass to the solute's mass, density to the solution's mass.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

4.50 M H₂SO₄ · density 1.25 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: molarity and density · wanted: mass percent · basis: 1 L of solution

Step 2 · Molar mass → mass of solute

Two masses come out of that liter. The molarity fixes the moles, and the molar mass their mass: 4.50 mol × 98.08 g/mol = 441.4 g H₂SO₄.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

4.50 M H₂SO₄ · density 1.25 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: molarity and density · wanted: mass percent · basis: 1 L of solution
Step 2 · Molar mass → mass of solute Step 3 · Density → mass of solution
1000 mL soln × 1.25 g soln1 mL soln = 1250 g solution
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

4.50 M H₂SO₄ · density 1.25 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: molarity and density · wanted: mass percent · basis: 1 L of solution
Step 2 · Molar mass → mass of solute Step 3 · Density → mass of solution
1000 mL soln × 1.25 g soln1 mL soln = 1250 g solution
Step 4 · Form the ratio
441.4 g H₂SO₄1250 g solution × 100 = 35.3% (m/m)
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

4.50 M H₂SO₄ · density 1.25 g/mL · molar mass 98.08 g/mol
given: molarity and density · wanted: mass percent · basis: 1 L of solution
Step 2 · Molar mass → mass of solute Step 3 · Density → mass of solution
1000 mL soln × 1.25 g soln1 mL soln = 1250 g solution
Step 4 · Form the ratio
441.4 g H₂SO₄1250 g solution × 100 = 35.3% (m/m)
The liter weighs 1250 g and carries 441 g of acid — a bit over a third: 35.3%. Battery acid is far more dilute than the 98% concentrate. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

25.0% (m/m) K₂CO₃ · density 1.24 g/mL · molar mass 138.21 g/mol
basis: take 1 L of solution · wanted: molarity

A 25.0% (m/m) potassium carbonate solution has a density of 1.24 g/mL. What is its molarity?

  1. 2.24 M
  2. 1.81 M
  3. 1.46 M
  4. 0.00224 M
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: A

25.0% (m/m) K₂CO₃ · density 1.24 g/mL · molar mass 138.21 g/mol
basis: take 1 L → 1240 g solution · wanted: molarity
1000 mL soln × 1.24 g soln1 mL soln × 25.0 g K₂CO₃100 g soln × 1 mol K₂CO₃138.21 g K₂CO₃ = 2.24 M — answer A

B skipped the density: 0.250 × 1000 ÷ 138.21 = 1.81, reading 1 L as 1000 g instead of 1240 g. C divided by the density: 0.250 × 1000 ÷ 1.24 ÷ 138.21 = 1.46. D dropped the 1000 mL: 0.250 × 1.24 ÷ 138.21 = 0.00224.

A liter weighs 1240 g, 310 g of it K₂CO₃, and 310 g ÷ 138.21 g/mol = 2.24 mol: 2.24 M. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A drum reads 36% by mass, density 1.18 g/mL. Name the two conversion factors that carry that label to a molarity, and say which one makes 1 L weigh more than 1000 g.
  2. Molarity and molality both describe one bottle. Which divides the moles by liters of solution, and which by kilograms of solvent, and which of the two needs the density to reach the other?

Freezing-point depression and boiling-point elevation count particles per kilogram of solvent — molality. Turning a labeled molarity or mass percent into molality is the first move in every colligative-property problem.

Dr. Karmach

6 · Freezing Point & Boiling Point

Count the dissolved particles with the van't Hoff factor i, then use ΔTf = i·Kf·m and ΔTb = i·Kb·m to find how far a solute lowers the freezing point and raises the boiling point of water.

Dr. Karmach

Salt on ice, antifreeze in a radiator

Scatter salt on a frozen walk and the ice melts below 0 °C. Antifreeze keeps a radiator from freezing in winter and boiling over in summer.

Dr. Karmach

Freezing lower, boiling higher

Water freezes into an ordered solid. Dissolved particles get in the way, so the solution must go colder to freeze and hotter to boil. Only the number of particles matters, not their identity.

Dr. Karmach

The size of the shift

water: Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol   Kb = 0.512 °C·kg/mol
ΔTf = i · Kf · m (down) · ΔTb = i · Kb · m (up)

Each equation multiplies the particle count i, the solvent constant K, and the molality m. Kf sets the freezing shift, Kb the boiling shift. A bigger i or higher m shifts more.

Dr. Karmach

The van't Hoff factor i

i counts how many particles each formula unit releases. A molecular solute stays whole, so i = 1. NaCl gives two ions, CaCl₂ three. More particles mean a bigger shift.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Count the particles. Read i: molecular 1, NaCl 2, CaCl₂ 3.
  2. Multiply i · K · m. Kf = 1.86 freezing, Kb = 0.512 boiling.
  3. Shift from pure water. New point = 0 − ΔTf, or 100 + ΔTb.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — freezing point of antifreeze

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 1.50 molal ethylene glycol · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: ΔTf

A radiator holds 1.50 molal ethylene glycol in water. Ethylene glycol is molecular: it dissolves without splitting into ions.

Count the particles, then multiply.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 1.50 molal ethylene glycol · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: ΔTf

Step 1 · Count the particles

Ethylene glycol is molecular. It dissolves as whole molecules, so i = 1.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 1.50 molal ethylene glycol · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: ΔTf
Step 1 · Count the particles Step 2 · Multiply i · K · m
ΔTf = 1 × 1.86 °C·kgmol × 1.50 molkg = 2.79 °C
A molecular solute still shifts the point. The freezing point drops to 0 − 2.79 = −2.79 °C. Freezing point goes DOWN. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — freezing point of a salt solution

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 1.20 molal NaCl · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: ΔTf

A 1.20 molal NaCl solution is spread on an icy road. A common first attempt multiplies Kf by m and stops.

Count the particles, then multiply.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 1.20 molal NaCl · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: ΔTf

A common first attempt

ΔTf = 1.86 °C·kgmol × 1.20 molkg = 2.23 °C ✗

NaCl is not one particle. This left out i.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 1.20 molal NaCl · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: ΔTf
A common first attempt
ΔTf = 1.86 °C·kgmol × 1.20 molkg = 2.23 °C ✗
Step 1 · Count the particles

NaCl dissolves into Na⁺ and Cl⁻: two particles per formula unit, so i = 2.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 1.20 molal NaCl · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: ΔTf
A common first attempt
ΔTf = 1.86 °C·kgmol × 1.20 molkg = 2.23 °C ✗
Step 1 · Count the particles Step 2 · Multiply i · K · m
ΔTf = 2 × 1.86 °C·kgmol × 1.20 molkg = 4.46 °C
Two ions double the depression: 4.46 °C, not 2.23 °C. The freezing point drops to −4.46 °C. Freezing point goes DOWN. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: count the particles

1.20 molal NaCl · Kf = 1.86
forgot i (i = 1): 1.86 × 1.20 = 2.23 °C ✗ · counted i = 2: 2 × 1.86 × 1.20 = 4.46 °C ✓

An ionic solute breaks into ions, and each ion counts. Skip i and the depression comes out too small. That is the usual mistake. Read i from the formula before multiplying.

Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 0.90 molal KCl · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: ΔTf

A 0.90 molal KCl solution is used as a de-icer. What is its freezing-point depression? (KCl → K⁺ + Cl⁻)

  1. 1.67 °C
  2. 0.92 °C
  3. 3.35 °C
  4. 1.80 °C
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: C

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
given: 0.90 molal KCl · i = 2 · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol
ΔTf = 2 × 1.86 °C·kgmol × 0.90 molkg = 3.35 °C — answer C

A forgot i: 1.86 × 0.90 = 1.67 °C uses i = 1, but KCl gives two ions. B used Kb: 2 × 0.512 × 0.90 = 0.92 °C is the boiling constant, not the freezing one. D dropped Kf: 2 × 0.90 = 1.80 leaves out 1.86 °C·kg/mol.

Two ions and Kf = 1.86 give a 3.35 °C depression. The freezing point drops to −3.35 °C. Freezing point goes DOWN. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — new freezing point of a road brine

new freezing point = 0 °C − ΔTf
given: 0.75 molal CaCl₂ · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: the new freezing point

A 0.75 molal CaCl₂ brine coats a winter road. A common first attempt reports the depression itself as the freezing point.

Find i, the depression, then the new freezing point.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

new freezing point = 0 °C − ΔTf
given: 0.75 molal CaCl₂ · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: the new freezing point

Step 1 · Count the particles

CaCl₂ dissolves into one Ca²⁺ and two Cl⁻: three particles, so i = 3.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

new freezing point = 0 °C − ΔTf
given: 0.75 molal CaCl₂ · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: the new freezing point
Step 1 · Count the particles Step 2 · Multiply i · K · m
ΔTf = 3 × 1.86 °C·kgmol × 0.75 molkg = 4.19 °C
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

new freezing point = 0 °C − ΔTf
given: 0.75 molal CaCl₂ · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: the new freezing point
Step 1 · Count the particles Step 2 · Multiply i · K · m
ΔTf = 3 × 1.86 °C·kgmol × 0.75 molkg = 4.19 °C
Step 3 · Shift from pure water
new freezing point = 0 °C − 4.19 °C = −4.19 °C
The depression is 4.19 °C, but the freezing point is 0 − 4.19 = −4.19 °C, not +4.19. Freezing point goes DOWN. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — new boiling point of a salt solution

new boiling point = 100 °C + ΔTb
given: 1.00 molal MgCl₂ · Kb = 0.512 °C·kg/mol · wanted: the new boiling point

MgCl₂ dissolves into one Mg²⁺ and two Cl⁻. Fill in i and Kb, find ΔTb, then add.

ΔTb = × × 1.00 = °C
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — new boiling point of a salt solution

new boiling point = 100 °C + ΔTb
given: 1.00 molal MgCl₂ · Kb = 0.512 °C·kg/mol · wanted: the new boiling point

MgCl₂ dissolves into one Mg²⁺ and two Cl⁻. Fill in i and Kb, find ΔTb, then add.

ΔTb = × × 1.00 = °C
ΔTb = 3 × 0.512 °C·kgmol × 1.00 molkg = 1.54 °C
new boiling point = 100 °C + 1.54 °C = 101.54 °C
Three ions and Kb = 0.512 raise the boiling point by 1.54 °C, to 101.54 °C. Boiling point goes UP. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

ΔTf = i · Kf · m
1.20 molal NaCl · i = 2 · Kf = 1.86 · correct ΔTf = 4.46 °C
Forgetting the particle count. Using i = 1 gives 1.86 × 1.20 = 2.23 °C. NaCl releases two ions, so i = 2 and ΔTf = 4.46 °C, twice as much.
Using Kb for a freezing problem. 2 × 0.512 × 1.20 = 1.23 °C uses the boiling constant. Freezing-point depression uses Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol.
Leaving out K. 2 × 1.20 = 2.40 multiplies only i and m. The constant Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol belongs in every term.
Reporting the depression as the temperature. A 4.19 °C depression is not a 4.19 °C freezing point. The new point is 0 − 4.19 = −4.19 °C.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

new freezing point = 0 °C − ΔTf
given: 1.00 molal BaCl₂ · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol · wanted: the new freezing point

A 1.00 molal BaCl₂ solution is cooled. What is its freezing point? (BaCl₂ → Ba²⁺ + 2 Cl⁻)

  1. -1.86 °C
  2. 5.58 °C
  3. -5.58 °C
  4. -3.00 °C
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: C

new freezing point = 0 °C − ΔTf
given: 1.00 molal BaCl₂ · i = 3 · Kf = 1.86 °C·kg/mol
ΔTf = 3 × 1.86 °C·kgmol × 1.00 molkg = 5.58 °C
new freezing point = 0 °C − 5.58 °C = −5.58 °C — answer C

A forgot i: 0 − (1.86 × 1.00) = −1.86 °C uses i = 1, but BaCl₂ gives three ions. B reported the depression: +5.58 °C skips the shift from 0. D dropped Kf: 3 × 1.00 = 3.00, so 0 − 3.00 = −3.00 °C leaves out 1.86.

Three ions give a 5.58 °C depression, and the freezing point drops to −5.58 °C. Freezing point goes DOWN. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A 0.50 molal molecular-solute solution and a 0.50 molal NaCl solution are both cooled. Which freezes at the lower temperature, and why?
  2. Write ΔTb for a 1.00 molal CaCl₂ solution, then its boiling point. Which constant belongs in the formula?

Freezing and boiling points depend only on how many particles dissolve. A nonvolatile solute also lowers a solvent's vapor pressure, and Raoult's law sets that pressure from the solvent's mole fraction.

Dr. Karmach

7 · Raoult's Law

Use Raoult's law to find a solution's vapor pressure from the moles of solvent and nonvolatile solute, scaling the pure solvent's pressure by the solvent's mole fraction, and confirm the result falls below the pure value.

Dr. Karmach

Salted water, less steam

Two pots reach the same temperature on one burner. The pot of plain water steams hard; the salted pot gives off noticeably less. The dissolved salt holds the water back.

Dr. Karmach

A nonvolatile solute lowers vapor pressure

Vapor comes only from solvent at the surface. A nonvolatile solute takes up surface spots and never leaves, so the pressure drops with the solvent's fraction.

Dr. Karmach

Raoult's law

The solution's vapor pressure is the pure value scaled by the solvent's mole fraction: P = Xsolvent · P°. Pure solvent sits at P°; every added mole of solute pulls P straight down the line.

Dr. Karmach

The pressure lowering, ΔP

ΔP = Xsolute · P° = P° − P
Xsolute = mol solute ÷ total moles · Xsolvent + Xsolute = 1

The drop from the pure pressure to the solution's is the pressure lowering, ΔP. It equals the solute's mole fraction times P° — the same amount you get as P° minus the solution's pressure.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. List what you know: moles of each and P°. Mark the unknown.
  2. Solvent's mole fraction: Xsolvent = mol solvent ÷ total.
  3. Apply Raoult's law: P = Xsolvent × P°; solve for the unknown.
  4. Check: P below P°.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — vapor pressure of a solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 5.0 mol water · 1.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 23.8 torr · wanted: P

Sugar is a nonvolatile solute: it dissolves in water but never enters the vapor. Dissolve 1.0 mol of it in 5.0 mol of water. Find the solution's vapor pressure. (pure water: 23.8 torr)

List what you know, then take the solvent's mole fraction.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 5.0 mol water · 1.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 23.8 torr · wanted: P

Step 1 · List what you know

5.0 mol of water is the solvent. 1.0 mol of nonvolatile solute. P° = 23.8 torr. The unknown is P.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 5.0 mol water · 1.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 23.8 torr · wanted: P
Step 1 · List what you know Step 2 · Solvent's mole fraction
Xsolvent = 5.0 mol water5.0 + 1.0 mol total = 0.833
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 5.0 mol water · 1.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 23.8 torr · wanted: P
Step 1 · List what you know Step 2 · Solvent's mole fraction
Xsolvent = 5.0 mol water5.0 + 1.0 mol total = 0.833
Step 3 · Apply Raoult's law
P = 0.833 × 23.8 torr = 19.8 torr
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 5.0 mol water · 1.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 23.8 torr · wanted: P
Step 1 · List what you know Step 2 · Solvent's mole fraction
Xsolvent = 5.0 mol water5.0 + 1.0 mol total = 0.833
Step 3 · Apply Raoult's law
P = 0.833 × 23.8 torr = 19.8 torr
Step 4 · Check
19.8 torr sits below the pure 23.8 torr — the nonvolatile solute lowered it. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — the pressure lowering

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 6.0 mol benzene · 2.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 95.1 torr · wanted: ΔP and P

A nonvolatile solute is dissolved in benzene: 2.0 mol of solute in 6.0 mol of benzene. Find the pressure lowering, ΔP, and the solution's vapor pressure. (pure benzene: 95.1 torr)

List the moles, then take each mole fraction.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 6.0 mol benzene · 2.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 95.1 torr · wanted: ΔP and P

Step 1 · List what you know

6.0 mol benzene is the solvent. 2.0 mol nonvolatile solute. P° = 95.1 torr.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 6.0 mol benzene · 2.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 95.1 torr · wanted: ΔP and P
Step 1 · List what you know Step 2 · Solvent's mole fraction
Xsolvent = 6.0 mol benzene6.0 + 2.0 mol total = 0.750

The solute takes the rest: Xsolute = 2.0 ÷ 8.0 = 0.250.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 6.0 mol benzene · 2.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 95.1 torr · wanted: ΔP and P
Step 1 · List what you know Step 2 · Solvent's mole fraction
Xsolvent = 6.0 mol benzene6.0 + 2.0 mol total = 0.750
Step 3 · Apply Raoult's law
P = 0.750 × 95.1 torr = 71.3 torr
71.3 torr is below the pure 95.1 torr. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — the pressure lowering

ΔP = Xsolute · P° = P° − P
2.0 mol solute of 8.0 mol total · Xsolute = 0.250 · P° = 95.1 torr · P = 71.3 torr

The lowering ΔP

ΔP = Xsolute · P° = 0.250 × 95.1 = 23.8 torr
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — the pressure lowering

ΔP = Xsolute · P° = P° − P
2.0 mol solute of 8.0 mol total · Xsolute = 0.250 · P° = 95.1 torr · P = 71.3 torr
The lowering ΔP
ΔP = Xsolute · P° = 0.250 × 95.1 = 23.8 torr
Step 4 · Check
P° − P = 95.1 − 71.3 = 23.8 torr
Both routes to ΔP agree, and P stays below P°. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — an ethanol solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 7.0 mol ethanol · 3.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 43.9 torr · wanted: P

3.0 mol of a nonvolatile solute is stirred into 7.0 mol of ethanol. Fill the solvent's mole fraction, then scale P°:

Xsolvent = mol ethanol mol total = → P = × 43.9 = torr
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — an ethanol solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 7.0 mol ethanol · 3.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 43.9 torr · wanted: P

3.0 mol of a nonvolatile solute is stirred into 7.0 mol of ethanol. Fill the solvent's mole fraction, then scale P°:

Xsolvent = mol ethanol mol total = → P = × 43.9 = torr
Xsolvent = 7.0 mol ethanol10.0 mol total = 0.700 → P = 0.700 × 43.9 = 30.7 torr
30.7 torr is below the pure 43.9 torr. The solute takes the rest: 43.9 − 30.7 = 13.2 torr of lowering. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

P = Xsolvent · P°
5.0 mol water · 1.0 mol solute · P° = 23.8 torr · correct P = 19.8 torr
Using the solute's mole fraction. (1.0 ÷ 6.0) × 23.8 = 3.97 torr is the pressure LOWERING, ΔP — the amount removed. The pressure that remains uses the solvent's fraction: (5.0 ÷ 6.0) × 23.8 = 19.8 torr.
Assuming the solute changes nothing. Leaving the answer at 23.8 torr. A nonvolatile solute always lowers the vapor pressure, so the result must fall below 23.8 torr — here to 19.8 torr.
Skipping the total in the fraction. (1.0 ÷ 5.0) × 23.8 = 4.76 torr divides solute by solvent. A mole fraction divides by the TOTAL moles: the solvent's fraction is 5.0 ÷ 6.0, not 1.0 ÷ 5.0.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 4.0 mol chloroform · 1.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 197.0 torr · wanted: P

1.0 mol of a nonvolatile solute is dissolved in 4.0 mol of chloroform. What is the solution's vapor pressure? (pure chloroform: 197.0 torr)

  1. 39.4 torr
  2. 49.25 torr
  3. 157.6 torr
  4. 197.0 torr
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: C

P = Xsolvent · P°
4.0 mol chloroform · 1.0 mol solute · total = 5.0 mol · P° = 197.0 torr
Xsolvent = 4.0 mol5.0 mol = 0.800 → P = 0.800 × 197.0 = 157.6 torr — answer C

A used the solute's fraction: (1.0 ÷ 5.0) × 197.0 = 39.4 torr, the lowering not the pressure. B divided solute by solvent: (1.0 ÷ 4.0) × 197.0 = 49.25 torr, not a mole fraction. D assumed no change: 197.0 torr, but a nonvolatile solute lowers it.

157.6 torr sits below the pure 197.0 torr — the solute lowered it. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — back out the moles of solute

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 8.0 mol benzene · solution P = 76.08 torr · P° = 95.1 torr · wanted: mol solute

A nonvolatile solute in 8.0 mol of benzene gives a solution vapor pressure of 76.08 torr. How many moles of solute are dissolved? (pure benzene: 95.1 torr)

A common first attempt: read the pressure ratio 76.08 ÷ 95.1 as the solute's share. Test it.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 8.0 mol benzene · solution P = 76.08 torr · P° = 95.1 torr · wanted: mol solute

A common first attempt

Xsolute? = 76.08 torr95.1 torr = 0.800 → solute = 32 mol ✗

32 mol of solute against 8.0 mol of benzene, yet the pressure barely fell.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 8.0 mol benzene · solution P = 76.08 torr · P° = 95.1 torr · wanted: mol solute
A common first attempt
Xsolute? = 76.08 torr95.1 torr = 0.800 → solute = 32 mol ✗
Step 1 · List what you know

8.0 mol benzene is the solvent. The solution reads P = 76.08 torr; pure benzene is P° = 95.1 torr. The unknown is the moles of nonvolatile solute.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 8.0 mol benzene · solution P = 76.08 torr · P° = 95.1 torr · wanted: mol solute
A common first attempt
Xsolute? = 76.08 torr95.1 torr = 0.800 → solute = 32 mol ✗
Step 1 · List what you know Step 2 · Solvent's mole fraction

Because P = Xsolvent·P°, the pressure ratio is the SOLVENT's fraction, not the solute's:

Xsolvent = P = 76.08 torr95.1 torr = 0.800
The pressure ratio is the solvent's share; its complement, 0.200, belongs to the solute. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — moles of solute

Xsolvent = mol benzene ÷ total
8.0 mol benzene · Xsolvent = 0.800 · P = 76.08 torr · P° = 95.1 torr

Step 3 · Apply Raoult's law

Solve Xsolvent = mol benzene ÷ total for the total, then subtract the benzene:

total = 8.0 mol benzene0.800 = 10.0 mol → solute = 10.0 − 8.0 = 2.0 mol
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — moles of solute

Xsolvent = mol benzene ÷ total
8.0 mol benzene · Xsolvent = 0.800 · P = 76.08 torr · P° = 95.1 torr
Step 3 · Apply Raoult's law
total = 8.0 mol benzene0.800 = 10.0 mol → solute = 10.0 − 8.0 = 2.0 mol
Step 4 · Check
solute share = 1 − 0.800 = 0.200 → 0.200 × 10.0 = 2.0 mol ✓
Both fractions give 2.0 mol; the 32 mol read the solvent's share as the solute's. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: use the solvent's mole fraction

solute's fraction → the lowering: (1.0 ÷ 6.0) × 23.8 = 3.97 torr ✗
5.0 mol water · 1.0 mol solute · P° = 23.8 torr — this is ΔP, not the pressure
solvent's fraction → the pressure: (5.0 ÷ 6.0) × 23.8 = 19.8 torr ✓
P = Xsolvent · P° · the two add back to P°: 3.97 + 19.8 = 23.8 torr

Raoult's law multiplies P° by the SOLVENT's mole fraction. The solute's fraction gives the drop, ΔP — the amount removed, not the pressure that remains.

Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

P = Xsolvent · P°
given: 6.0 mol ethanol · 2.0 mol nonvolatile solute · P° = 43.9 torr · wanted: P

2.0 mol of a nonvolatile solute is dissolved in 6.0 mol of ethanol. What is the solution's vapor pressure? (pure ethanol: 43.9 torr)

  1. 43.9 torr
  2. 32.9 torr
  3. 14.6 torr
  4. 11.0 torr
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: B

P = Xsolvent · P°
6.0 mol ethanol · 2.0 mol solute · total = 8.0 mol · P° = 43.9 torr
Xsolvent = 6.0 mol8.0 mol = 0.750 → P = 0.750 × 43.9 = 32.9 torr — answer B

A assumed no change: 43.9 torr, but a nonvolatile solute lowers it. C divided solute by solvent: (2.0 ÷ 6.0) × 43.9 = 14.6 torr, not a mole fraction. D used the solute's fraction: (2.0 ÷ 8.0) × 43.9 = 11.0 torr, the lowering not the pressure.

32.9 torr is below the pure 43.9 torr, and well above the 11.0 torr lowering — the pressure keeps most of P°. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A solution holds 8.0 mol of water and 2.0 mol of a nonvolatile solute; pure water is 23.8 torr. Which mole fraction scales P°, and what is the solution's vapor pressure?
  2. A nonvolatile solute drops a solvent's vapor pressure from 90.0 torr to 72.0 torr. Write the pressure lowering ΔP, and give the solvent's mole fraction.

A nonvolatile solute sets how much solvent escapes. A gas does the reverse from outside: Henry's law sets how much gas dissolves into a solvent, and that amount climbs with the gas's pressure above the liquid.

Dr. Karmach

8 · Henry's Law

Use Henry's law — a gas's solubility is directly proportional to its partial pressure, S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂ — to find a new solubility, or the pressure that produces it, at constant temperature.

Dr. Karmach

Open a soda and it erupts

Crack the tab on a shaken can and it hisses, then foams over. Sealed, the fizz stayed down in the drink. Opened, the gas escapes all at once.

Dr. Karmach

More gas overhead, more gas dissolved

At constant temperature, a gas's solubility (how much dissolves) rises and falls in step with its partial pressure, the push of that gas on the surface. More gas overhead drives more into solution.

Dr. Karmach

Solubility is proportional to pressure

Plot the dissolved amount against the partial pressure: the points fall on a straight line through the origin. Double the pressure, double the dissolved gas. The slope depends only on the gas and temperature.

Dr. Karmach

Henry's law is direct, not inverse

Raise the pressure and solubility rises with it. The two move the same way. Boyle's law is the opposite: squeeze a trapped gas and its volume shrinks. Same variable, but opposite behavior.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Identify given and wanted. Mark the unknown.
  2. Set up the proportion. Same gas, constant temperature: S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂.
  3. Rearrange for the unknown.
  4. Substitute and check. More pressure means more dissolved gas.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — more pressure, more dissolved

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 4.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂

Water sits under carbon dioxide. At 1.0 atm of CO₂, 1.45 g/L dissolves. The CO₂ pressure is raised to 4.0 atm at constant temperature. Find the new solubility.

Identify the given and the wanted, and note what is held fixed.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 4.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂

Step 1 · Identify given and wanted

S₁ = 1.45 g/L at P₁ = 1.0 atm. P₂ = 4.0 atm. The gas and the temperature do not change. The unknown is S₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 4.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂
Step 1 · Identify given and wanted Step 2 · Set up the proportion

Same gas, constant temperature, so S/P stays constant: S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 4.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂
Step 1 · Identify given and wanted Step 2 · Set up the proportion Step 3 · Rearrange for the unknown
S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂ S₂ = S₁ × P₂P₁

The new pressure goes on top: solubility climbs with pressure.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 4.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂
Step 1 · Identify given and wanted Step 2 · Set up the proportion Step 3 · Rearrange for the unknown
S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂ S₂ = S₁ × P₂P₁
Step 4 · Substitute and check
S₂ = 1.45 g/L × 4.0 atm1.0 atm = 5.80 g/L
Pressure quadrupled at constant temperature, so four times as much CO₂ dissolves: 1.45 → 5.80 g/L. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — pressure released, gas comes out

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 5.80 g/L · P₁ = 4.0 atm · P₂ = 1.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂

A carbonation tank holds water under 4.0 atm of CO₂, dissolving 5.80 g/L. The CO₂ pressure is bled down to 1.0 atm. Find the new dissolved amount.

List the given and the wanted, and mark what is held fixed.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 5.80 g/L · P₁ = 4.0 atm · P₂ = 1.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂

Step 1 · Identify given and wanted

S₁ = 5.80 g/L at P₁ = 4.0 atm. P₂ = 1.0 atm. The gas and the temperature are unchanged. The unknown is S₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 5.80 g/L · P₁ = 4.0 atm · P₂ = 1.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂
Step 1 · Identify given and wanted Step 2 · Set up the proportion

Same gas, constant temperature, so S/P stays constant: S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 5.80 g/L · P₁ = 4.0 atm · P₂ = 1.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂
Step 1 · Identify given and wanted Step 2 · Set up the proportion Step 3 · Rearrange for the unknown
S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂ S₂ = S₁ × P₂P₁

The new pressure still goes on top; here it is the smaller one.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 5.80 g/L · P₁ = 4.0 atm · P₂ = 1.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂
Step 1 · Identify given and wanted Step 2 · Set up the proportion Step 3 · Rearrange for the unknown
S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂ S₂ = S₁ × P₂P₁
Step 4 · Substitute and check
S₂ = 5.80 g/L × 1.0 atm4.0 atm = 1.45 g/L
Pressure dropped to a quarter, so only a quarter of the CO₂ stays dissolved: 5.80 → 1.45 g/L. The rest fizzes out. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — nitrogen under pressure

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 0.019 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 5.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂

Nitrogen dissolves at 0.019 g/L under 1.0 atm of N₂. A reactor blankets the liquid with N₂ at 5.0 atm. Find the new solubility.

S₂ = 0.019 g/L × atm atm = g/L

Put the new pressure on top and the old pressure below, then compute.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — nitrogen under pressure

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 0.019 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 5.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂

Nitrogen dissolves at 0.019 g/L under 1.0 atm of N₂. A reactor blankets the liquid with N₂ at 5.0 atm. Find the new solubility.

S₂ = 0.019 g/L × atm atm = g/L

Put the new pressure on top and the old pressure below, then compute.

S₂ = 0.019 g/L × 5.0 atm1.0 atm = 0.095 g/L
Pressure rose fivefold, so five times as much N₂ dissolves: 0.019 → 0.095 g/L. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
1.45 g/L of CO₂ at 1.0 atm, raised to 4.0 atm · correct S₂ = 5.80 g/L
Inverting the proportion. Pressure rose from 1.0 to 4.0 atm, so more CO₂ dissolves. Writing 1.45 × (1.0/4.0) = 0.363 g/L predicts less — that is Boyle's inverse ratio. Henry's law is direct: the new pressure goes on top, (P₂/P₁).
Adding the pressure change. Solubility is a proportion, not a sum. Adding the change, 1.45 + (4.0 − 1.0) = 4.45 g/L, tacks atm onto g/L. Multiply by the pressure ratio instead.
Assuming no change. The partial pressure quadrupled, so the dissolved amount cannot stay 1.45 g/L. Raising the pressure forces more gas in; the solubility must rise.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 0.043 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 5.0 atm · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: S₂

Oxygen dissolves at 0.043 g/L under 1.0 atm of O₂. Under a 5.0 atm atmosphere of O₂ at the same temperature, what is its solubility?

  1. 0.0086 g/L
  2. 4.043 g/L
  3. 0.215 g/L
  4. 0.043 g/L
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: C

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
O₂ · S₁ = 0.043 g/L at P₁ = 1.0 atm · P₂ = 5.0 atm · constant temperature
S₂ = 0.043 g/L × 5.0 atm1.0 atm = 0.215 g/L — answer C

A inverted the proportion like Boyle's law: 0.043 × (1.0/5.0) = 0.0086 g/L, less dissolved though the pressure rose. B added the pressure change: 0.043 + (5.0 − 1.0) = 4.043 g/L, adding atm to g/L. D assumed no change: at 5.0 atm the solubility cannot stay 0.043 g/L.

Pressure rose fivefold, so five times as much O₂ dissolves: 0.043 → 0.215 g/L. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — the pressure to reach a target

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L at P₁ = 1.0 atm · target S₂ = 8.70 g/L · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: P₂

A bottler wants 8.70 g/L of CO₂ dissolved. At 1.0 atm only 1.45 g/L dissolves. What CO₂ partial pressure reaches the target?

A common first attempt: invert the ratio, the way Boyle's law does. Test the result.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L at P₁ = 1.0 atm · target S₂ = 8.70 g/L · wanted: P₂

A common first attempt

P₂ = 1.0 atm × 1.45 g/L8.70 g/L = 0.167 atm ✗

Less pressure to dissolve more gas is impossible. Inverting the ratio follows Boyle's law, not Henry's law.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L at P₁ = 1.0 atm · target S₂ = 8.70 g/L · wanted: P₂
A common first attempt
P₂ = 1.0 atm × 1.45 g/L8.70 g/L = 0.167 atm ✗
Step 1 · Identify given and wanted

S₁ = 1.45 g/L at P₁ = 1.0 atm. The target is S₂ = 8.70 g/L. The unknown is P₂.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 1.45 g/L at P₁ = 1.0 atm · target S₂ = 8.70 g/L · wanted: P₂
A common first attempt
P₂ = 1.0 atm × 1.45 g/L8.70 g/L = 0.167 atm ✗
Step 1 · Identify given and wanted Step 2 · Set up the proportion

Same gas, constant temperature, so S/P stays constant: S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂.

The solubility must rise sixfold, so the pressure must rise too, not fall. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — the pressure needed

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
S₁ = 1.45 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · S₂ = 8.70 g/L · wanted: P₂

Step 3 · Rearrange for the unknown

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂ P₂ = P₁ × S₂S₁

The larger solubility goes on top, so the pressure comes out larger.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — the pressure needed

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
S₁ = 1.45 g/L · P₁ = 1.0 atm · S₂ = 8.70 g/L · wanted: P₂
Step 3 · Rearrange for the unknown
S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂ P₂ = P₁ × S₂S₁
Step 4 · Substitute and check
P₂ = 1.0 atm × 8.70 g/L1.45 g/L = 6.0 atm
To dissolve six times as much CO₂, the partial pressure must be six times higher: 1.0 → 6.0 atm. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: Henry's law is direct

inverted (Boyle's ratio): 1.0 × (1.45 / 8.70) → P = 0.167 atm
less pressure for more gas — impossible ✗
direct (Henry's law): 1.0 × (8.70 / 1.45) → P = 6.0 atm
more gas needs more pressure ✓

Solubility climbs with partial pressure, so the larger solubility goes on top of the ratio. Boyle's upside-down ratio would demand less pressure for more gas. That cannot happen.

Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
given: S₁ = 0.046 g/L at P₁ = 2.0 atm · target S₂ = 0.115 g/L · same gas, constant temperature · wanted: P₂

Methane dissolves at 0.046 g/L under 2.0 atm of CH₄. What CH₄ partial pressure gives 0.115 g/L dissolved, at the same temperature?

  1. 0.80 atm
  2. 5.0 atm
  3. 2.069 atm
  4. 2.0 atm
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: B

S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂
CH₄ · S₁ = 0.046 g/L at P₁ = 2.0 atm · S₂ = 0.115 g/L · constant temperature
P₂ = 2.0 atm × 0.115 g/L0.046 g/L = 5.0 atm — answer B

A inverted the proportion: 2.0 × (0.046/0.115) = 0.80 atm, less pressure for more gas. C added the change: 2.0 + (0.115 − 0.046) = 2.069 atm, adding g/L to atm. D assumed no change: keeping 2.0 atm leaves the solubility at 0.046 g/L, not 0.115.

The solubility must rise 2.5-fold, so the partial pressure must rise the same way: 2.0 → 5.0 atm. ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A sealed soda is opened and the gas pressing above it drops sharply. Does the dissolved gas rise or fall, and why does the drink fizz?
  2. Write S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂ solved for S₂. When the partial pressure triples, what happens to the solubility?

Henry's law reads a dissolved amount straight off a pressure. A titration reads an unknown concentration a different way: add a measured reactant until it exactly consumes the unknown, and the volume it took fixes the concentration.

Dr. Karmach

9 · Titration Calculations

Find an unknown acid concentration from a titration by counting the titrant's millimoles, dividing out the balanced equation's base-to-acid ratio, and dividing by the acid's volume; the milliliters cancel.

Dr. Karmach

Reading the acid in vinegar

Add a drop of dye to vinegar, then drip in a known base until the color just changes. The base you used measures the acid.

Dr. Karmach

The equivalence point

Add a known base to an acid until an indicator flips; this addition is a titration. At the flip, the equivalence point, the base has neutralized it. Moles of OH⁻ added equal moles of H⁺ available.

Dr. Karmach

Equal millimoles in a 1:1 reaction

0.200 M × 25.00 mL = 5.00 mmol
molarity × volume, with volume in mL, counts millimoles
Macid · Vacid = Mbase · Vbase
1 : 1 acid to base · both volumes in mL, so the mL cancel

Moles equal molarity times volume. With volume in milliliters, that product counts millimoles. When an acid and base react one-to-one, their millimoles are equal.

Dr. Karmach

Polyprotic acids need the mole ratio

Macid = Mbase · Vbase ÷ (ratio · Vacid)
ratio = base units per acid unit · the mL cancel, so no liter step

A diprotic acid gives two H⁺ per unit; a triprotic gives three. Each H⁺ takes one OH⁻, so the balanced equation's coefficients set the base-to-acid ratio.

Dr. Karmach

The method

  1. Moles of titrant: molarity times volume in mL gives millimoles.
  2. Apply the mole ratio: divide by the base-to-acid ratio from the balanced equation.
  3. Divide by the analyte volume: those millimoles over the acid's mL give the molarity.
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — a one-to-one titration

HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H₂O
given: 20.00 mL HCl titrated by 25.00 mL of 0.200 M NaOH · wanted: M of the HCl

A 20.00 mL sample of hydrochloric acid of unknown concentration is titrated with 0.200 M NaOH. The indicator changes color after 25.00 mL of base. Find the concentration of the acid.

Set it up: the base's millimoles, the 1:1 ratio, then divide by the acid's volume.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H₂O
given: 20.00 mL HCl · 25.00 mL of 0.200 M NaOH · wanted: M of the HCl

Three moves: the titrant's millimoles, the one-to-one ratio, then divide by the acid's volume.

Step 1 · Moles of titrant

The base's molarity is 0.200 mmol per mL. Its volume converts to millimoles; the mL cancel:

25.00 mL base × 0.200 mmol NaOH1 mL base = 5.00 mmol NaOH
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H₂O
given: 20.00 mL HCl · 25.00 mL of 0.200 M NaOH · wanted: M of the HCl
Step 1 · Moles of titrant
25.00 mL base × 0.200 mmol NaOH1 mL base = 5.00 mmol NaOH
Step 2 · Apply the mole ratio

HCl and NaOH react one-to-one, so the acid supplied the same count: 5.00 mmol HCl.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H₂O
given: 20.00 mL HCl · 25.00 mL of 0.200 M NaOH · wanted: M of the HCl
Step 1 · Moles of titrant
25.00 mL base × 0.200 mmol NaOH1 mL base = 5.00 mmol NaOH
Step 2 · Apply the mole ratio Step 3 · Divide by the analyte volume

The acid's millimoles over its volume give the molarity. Millimoles per milliliter is moles per liter:

M = 5.00 mmol HCl20.00 mL acid = 0.250 M HCl
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 1 — solution

HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H₂O
given: 20.00 mL HCl · 25.00 mL of 0.200 M NaOH · wanted: M of the HCl
Step 1 · Moles of titrant
25.00 mL base × 0.200 mmol NaOH1 mL base = 5.00 mmol NaOH
Step 2 · Apply the mole ratio Step 3 · Divide by the analyte volume
M = 5.00 mmol HCl20.00 mL acid = 0.250 M HCl
The base's 25.00 mL slightly topped the acid's 20.00 mL at 0.200 M, so the acid runs a little higher: 0.250 M ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — a diprotic acid

H₂SO₄ + 2 NaOH → Na₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 20.00 mL H₂SO₄ titrated by 32.00 mL of 0.250 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄

A 20.00 mL sample of sulfuric acid is titrated with 0.250 M NaOH, and the indicator changes color after 32.00 mL of base. Sulfuric acid is diprotic: each unit gives two H⁺. Find its concentration.

A tempting shortcut: carry the base's millimoles straight to the acid's volume. Test it against the balanced equation.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

H₂SO₄ + 2 NaOH → Na₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 20.00 mL H₂SO₄ · 32.00 mL of 0.250 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄

Three moves, but the base-to-acid ratio is no longer one.

Step 1 · Moles of titrant

The base delivers 0.250 mmol per mL, so 32.00 mL is 8.00 mmol NaOH.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

H₂SO₄ + 2 NaOH → Na₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 20.00 mL H₂SO₄ · 32.00 mL of 0.250 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄
Step 1 · Moles of titrant The tempting shortcut

Carry the base's millimoles straight to the acid's volume, as if the ratio were one:

M = 8.00 mmol NaOH20.00 mL acid = 0.400 M ✗
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — solution

H₂SO₄ + 2 NaOH → Na₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 20.00 mL H₂SO₄ · 32.00 mL of 0.250 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄
Step 1 · Moles of titrant The tempting shortcut

Carry the base's millimoles straight to the acid's volume, as if the ratio were one:

M = 8.00 mmol NaOH20.00 mL acid = 0.400 M ✗
Each H₂SO₄ gives two H⁺, so those 8.00 mmol OH⁻ neutralized only half as many acid units. ✗
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — the mole ratio

H₂SO₄ + 2 NaOH → Na₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 20.00 mL H₂SO₄ · 32.00 mL of 0.250 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄

Step 2 · Apply the mole ratio Step 3 · Divide by the analyte volume

The ratio, 1 H₂SO₄ per 2 NaOH, halves the count; the acid's volume then divides:

32.00 mL base × 0.250 mmol NaOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₂SO₄2 mmol NaOH = 4.00 mmol H₂SO₄, then ÷ 20.00 mL acid = 0.200 M H₂SO₄
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 2 — the mole ratio

H₂SO₄ + 2 NaOH → Na₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 20.00 mL H₂SO₄ · 32.00 mL of 0.250 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄
Step 2 · Apply the mole ratio Step 3 · Divide by the analyte volume
32.00 mL base × 0.250 mmol NaOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₂SO₄2 mmol NaOH = 4.00 mmol H₂SO₄, then ÷ 20.00 mL acid = 0.200 M H₂SO₄
The 2:1 ratio halves the acid's millimoles, so its concentration is half the shortcut's guess: 0.200 M, not 0.400 M ✓
Dr. Karmach

Take-home: a polyprotic acid is not 1:1

H₂SO₄ + 2 NaOH → Na₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 32.00 mL of 0.250 M NaOH · 20.00 mL H₂SO₄
M = 8.00 mmol NaOH20.00 mL acid = 0.400 M ✗ — counts each H₂SO₄ as one H⁺
32.00 mL base × 0.250 mmol NaOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₂SO₄2 mmol NaOH ÷ 20.00 mL acid = 0.200 M ✓

A diprotic acid feeds two H⁺, a triprotic three. The balanced equation's ratio divides the base's millimoles before the volume does. Skip it and every diprotic answer comes out doubled.

Dr. Karmach

Your turn — sulfuric acid and KOH

H₂SO₄ + 2 KOH → K₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 40.00 mL of 0.150 M KOH · 25.00 mL H₂SO₄ · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄

It takes 40.00 mL of 0.150 M KOH to titrate 25.00 mL of H₂SO₄. Fill the molarity, the 2:1 ratio, and the acid's volume, then compute:

40.00 mL base × mmol KOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₂SO₄ mmol KOH = mmol H₂SO₄, then ÷ mL acid = M
Dr. Karmach

Your turn — sulfuric acid and KOH

H₂SO₄ + 2 KOH → K₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 40.00 mL of 0.150 M KOH · 25.00 mL H₂SO₄ · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄

It takes 40.00 mL of 0.150 M KOH to titrate 25.00 mL of H₂SO₄. Fill the molarity, the 2:1 ratio, and the acid's volume, then compute:

40.00 mL base × mmol KOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₂SO₄ mmol KOH = mmol H₂SO₄, then ÷ mL acid = M
40.00 mL base × 0.150 mmol KOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₂SO₄2 mmol KOH = 3.00 mmol H₂SO₄, then ÷ 25.00 mL acid = 0.120 M H₂SO₄
Dr. Karmach

Where this goes wrong

H₂SO₄ + 2 NaOH → Na₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 32.00 mL of 0.250 M NaOH · 20.00 mL H₂SO₄ · correct: 8.00 mmol NaOH → 4.00 mmol H₂SO₄ → 0.200 M
Treating the diprotic acid as 1:1. 8.00 mmol ÷ 20.00 mL = 0.400 M, double the truth. Each H₂SO₄ gives two H⁺, so divide the base's millimoles by 2 first.
Multiplying by the ratio instead of dividing. 2 × 8.00 ÷ 20.00 = 0.800 M. The acid holds more per proton, so the ratio 2 belongs in the denominator.
Swapping the two volumes. Pairing 0.250 M with 20.00 mL gives 0.250 × 20.00 ÷ 2 ÷ 32.00 = 0.0781 M. Each molarity multiplies its own solution's volume.
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1

H₂SO₄ + 2 LiOH → Li₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
titrant 0.300 M LiOH · sample 25.00 mL H₂SO₄

It takes 30.00 mL of 0.300 M LiOH to reach the color change while titrating 25.00 mL of H₂SO₄. What is the concentration of the sulfuric acid?

  1. 0.125 M
  2. 0.180 M
  3. 0.360 M
  4. 0.720 M
Dr. Karmach

Practice 1 — answer: B

H₂SO₄ + 2 LiOH → Li₂SO₄ + 2 H₂O
given: 25.00 mL H₂SO₄ · 30.00 mL of 0.300 M LiOH · wanted: M of the H₂SO₄
30.00 mL base × 0.300 mmol LiOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₂SO₄2 mmol LiOH = 4.50 mmol H₂SO₄, then ÷ 25.00 mL acid = 0.180 M — answer B

A swapped the two volumes: 0.300 × 25.00 ÷ 2 ÷ 30.00 = 0.125. C ignored the 2:1 ratio: 9.00 ÷ 25.00 = 0.360. D multiplied by the ratio: 2 × 9.00 ÷ 25.00 = 0.720.

Two LiOH per H₂SO₄, so the acid holds half the base's 9.00 mmol in a slightly larger volume: 0.180 M ✓
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — a triprotic acid

H₃PO₄ + 3 NaOH → Na₃PO₄ + 3 H₂O
given: 25.00 mL H₃PO₄ titrated by 30.00 mL of 0.150 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₃PO₄

A 25.00 mL sample of phosphoric acid is titrated with 0.150 M NaOH, reaching the color change after 30.00 mL of base. Phosphoric acid is triprotic: each unit gives three H⁺. Find its concentration.

Count the moves: the base's millimoles, the 3:1 ratio, then the acid's volume.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

H₃PO₄ + 3 NaOH → Na₃PO₄ + 3 H₂O
given: 25.00 mL H₃PO₄ · 30.00 mL of 0.150 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₃PO₄

Three protons per acid make the ratio 3:1; otherwise the same three moves.

Step 1 · Moles of titrant

30.00 mL of 0.150 M NaOH delivers 4.50 mmol NaOH.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

H₃PO₄ + 3 NaOH → Na₃PO₄ + 3 H₂O
given: 25.00 mL H₃PO₄ · 30.00 mL of 0.150 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₃PO₄
Step 1 · Moles of titrant Step 2 · Apply the mole ratio

Each H₃PO₄ takes three NaOH, so divide by three: 1.50 mmol H₃PO₄.

Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

H₃PO₄ + 3 NaOH → Na₃PO₄ + 3 H₂O
given: 25.00 mL H₃PO₄ · 30.00 mL of 0.150 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₃PO₄
Step 1 · Moles of titrant Step 2 · Apply the mole ratio Step 3 · Divide by the analyte volume
30.00 mL base × 0.150 mmol NaOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₃PO₄3 mmol NaOH = 1.50 mmol H₃PO₄, then ÷ 25.00 mL acid = 0.060 M H₃PO₄
Dr. Karmach

Worked example 3 — solution

H₃PO₄ + 3 NaOH → Na₃PO₄ + 3 H₂O
given: 25.00 mL H₃PO₄ · 30.00 mL of 0.150 M NaOH · wanted: M of the H₃PO₄
Step 1 · Moles of titrant Step 2 · Apply the mole ratio Step 3 · Divide by the analyte volume
30.00 mL base × 0.150 mmol NaOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₃PO₄3 mmol NaOH = 1.50 mmol H₃PO₄, then ÷ 25.00 mL acid = 0.060 M H₃PO₄
Ignoring the 3:1 gives 4.50 ÷ 25.00 = 0.180 M, three times too high. The three protons pull the true value to a third: 0.060 M ✓
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2

H₃PO₄ + 3 KOH → K₃PO₄ + 3 H₂O
titrant 0.200 M KOH · sample 20.00 mL H₃PO₄

It takes 45.00 mL of 0.200 M KOH to reach the color change while titrating 20.00 mL of H₃PO₄. What is the concentration of the phosphoric acid?

  1. 0.0296 M
  2. 0.150 M
  3. 0.450 M
  4. 1.35 M
Dr. Karmach

Practice 2 — answer: B

H₃PO₄ + 3 KOH → K₃PO₄ + 3 H₂O
given: 20.00 mL H₃PO₄ · 45.00 mL of 0.200 M KOH · wanted: M of the H₃PO₄
45.00 mL base × 0.200 mmol KOH1 mL base × 1 mmol H₃PO₄3 mmol KOH = 3.00 mmol H₃PO₄, then ÷ 20.00 mL acid = 0.150 M — answer B

A swapped the two volumes: 0.200 × 20.00 ÷ 3 ÷ 45.00 = 0.0296. C ignored the 3:1 ratio: 9.00 ÷ 20.00 = 0.450. D multiplied by the ratio: 3 × 9.00 ÷ 20.00 = 1.35.

Three KOH per H₃PO₄, so the acid holds a third of the base's 9.00 mmol: 3.00 mmol in 20.00 mL, 0.150 M ✓
Dr. Karmach

Check yourself

  1. A 1:1 titration takes 24.0 mL of 0.150 M NaOH to neutralize 20.0 mL of HCl. Set up Macid = Mbase · Vbase ÷ Vacid and find the HCl concentration.
  2. Phosphoric acid reacts as H₃PO₄ + 3 NaOH → Na₃PO₄ + 3 H₂O. Which number becomes the base-to-acid ratio in the denominator, and where does it come from?

Every calculation here counted moles with a concentration, then crossed substances with the balanced equation's ratio — the same mole-ratio bridge that drives reaction stoichiometry. A concentration is only another way to count the moles a reaction runs on.

Dr. Karmach

Can you…?

  • ☐ explain "like dissolves like" and predict whether a solute dissolves in a given solvent?
  • ☐ describe unsaturated, saturated, and supersaturated solutions and read a solubility curve?
  • ☐ use the dilution relation M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ to find a concentration or volume?
  • ☐ calculate molality and mole fraction, and convert among molarity, molality, and mass percent?
  • ☐ apply colligative properties — freezing-point depression, boiling-point elevation, and Raoult's law — using the van't Hoff factor?
  • ☐ apply Henry's law to gas solubility and titration stoichiometry to find an unknown concentration?

If any box stays empty, the practice site has a drill for it. 🧪

Dr. Karmach